1,776
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:I thought i did. {{User:Byzantinefire/Sig}} 17:10, 16 July 2017 (UTC) | :I thought i did. {{User:Byzantinefire/Sig}} 17:10, 16 July 2017 (UTC) | ||
::Again, because we are required, as a wiki, to respect copyrights, we cannot and we highly discourage the use of images that are too high-quality. It's in the license templates themselves. Therefore, the high quality of the images isn't of importance here, and it really shouldn't be of importance on any wiki running MediaWiki software. Also, I don't see how changing this rule will change the likelihood that people will cone to the wiki and edit. There's no direct correlation between the two. The only reason I could see for allowing them is because it's just easier, but given that screenshotting the trailers themselves isn't that much more complicated (I just have to push Windows+Pent Scrn), there really isn't a lot of advantage afforded by using the Disney-provided images. {{KeybladeSpyMaster/Sig}} 17:42, 16 July 2017 (UTC) | ::Again, because we are required, as a wiki, to respect copyrights, we cannot and we highly discourage the use of images that are too high-quality. It's in the license templates themselves. Therefore, the high quality of the images isn't of importance here, and it really shouldn't be of importance on any wiki running MediaWiki software. Also, I don't see how changing this rule will change the likelihood that people will cone to the wiki and edit. There's no direct correlation between the two. The only reason I could see for allowing them is because it's just easier, but given that screenshotting the trailers themselves isn't that much more complicated (I just have to push Windows+Pent Scrn), there really isn't a lot of advantage afforded by using the Disney-provided images. {{KeybladeSpyMaster/Sig}} 17:42, 16 July 2017 (UTC) | ||
:::No one on the Disney Wiki seems to have a problem with it. {{User:Byzantinefire/Sig}} 17:56, 16 July 2017 (UTC) |
edits