Forum:Staff Election: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
#{{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} | #{{User:TheFifteenthMember/Sig1}} | ||
#{{KeybladeSpyMaster/Sig}} | #{{KeybladeSpyMaster/Sig}} | ||
#{{User: Master Riku the Bloody/Sig1}} | |||
===AGAINST=== | ===AGAINST=== |
Revision as of 21:27, 12 September 2014
|
Votes
FOR
AGAINST
Discussion
Should we have a "Votes FOR" and "Votes AGAINST" or keep it as it is now? TheFifteenthMember 19:16, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- I think the former, as it gives opportunity to voice why not. We'll also be able to tell the difference between not wanting an election, and general site inactivity. KeybladeSpyMaster 19:29, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Remind me, what called this on? What projects need "staff power" help? Chainoffire 19:59, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- There hasn't been a particular ignition trigger, however with more staff leaving/becoming inactive, an extra helping hand would be useful to slightly relieve the workload of the current staff. TheFifteenthMember 20:08, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Imo, any respected and well known community member should be able to apply for a staff position at any time (with an obvious limit to how often you can apply), it's then up to the community to decide to be for it or against it. No special elections should be needed, it's just a bureaucratic speed bump. Sove 20:33, 12 September 2014 (UTC)