MediaWiki talk:Sitenotice: Difference between revisions
From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I recommend the site notice used for temporary wiki-wide notices. For instance, I will be replacing these "please do not" lines with a notice on a "spring cleaning session" soon. '''<font face="Trebuchet MS"><span style="background:#3300CC">[[User:Bluerfn|<span style="color:white"><sup>BLUER</sup></span>]]</span>[[User talk:Bluerfn|<span style="color:#CC0011">一番</span>]]</font>''' 12:03, November 16, 2009 (UTC) | I recommend the site notice used for temporary wiki-wide notices. For instance, I will be replacing these "please do not" lines with a notice on a "spring cleaning session" soon. '''<font face="Trebuchet MS"><span style="background:#3300CC">[[User:Bluerfn|<span style="color:white"><sup>BLUER</sup></span>]]</span>[[User talk:Bluerfn|<span style="color:#CC0011">一番</span>]]</font>''' 12:03, November 16, 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I've tried to condense the lines down to two with hopefully nicer tone, and specifically reworded the fanart restriction to one that encourages it, but drives traffic towards the fanon wiki (two bonuses!). Is this acceptable?[[User:KrytenKoro|<small>Glorious</small>]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|<small>CHAOS!</small>]] 15:57, November 16, 2009 (UTC) | :I've tried to condense the lines down to two with hopefully nicer tone, and specifically reworded the fanart restriction to one that encourages it, but drives traffic towards the fanon wiki (two bonuses!). Is this acceptable?[[User:KrytenKoro|<small>Glorious</small>]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|<small>CHAOS!</small>]] 15:57, November 16, 2009 (UTC) | ||
::but I'm not sure why we should give the fanon wiki a spot in the limelight, especially when I can't find any linking back to this wiki from there. Also, most of these links are already in the sidebar. For one, the advice to refer to "Wiki Guidelines" could be placed in the Editing page whenever anyone presses the "Edit this page" link/tab, that we could do. | |||
::I understand to whom and for what these messages are aiming for, and while this is so much better, I would like these removed altogether. We have these links pointed out in the sidebar already. Registered users can already see them in the Welcome message, and anons can register if they're serious in editing. And as for that fanon link... until the Fanon wiki links back to us, I don't think we should be giving them free spotlight across the wiki. | |||
::Oh, and I'm adding the deletion notice until the time is up. '''<font face="Trebuchet MS"><span style="background:#3300CC">[[User:Bluerfn|<span style="color:white"><sup>BLUER</sup></span>]]</span>[[User talk:Bluerfn|<span style="color:#CC0011">一番</span>]]</font>''' 13:50, November 18, 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:50, 18 November 2009
Cannon
Cannon Gun, Cannon Ball, Ice Cannon, and Huge Cannon? Might want to fix that misspelling, or we're going to have very few pages left. =PGlorious CHAOS! 02:24, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
- lulz, didn't notice that. Guess I got a little overzealous when typing "canon" because I was picturing me firing all the pages out of one, over to the Fannon... I mean fanon wiki :) -Azul (talk ・contribs) 06:13, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Haven't the blogs been removed from the namespace already ? TNÉ je t'♥ mélancolie ! 03:05, October 31, 2009 (UTC)
Please do not, please do not
I'll be removing these lines; too many lines, too many restrictions here. And what's worse, it's pushing our pages down, especially for casual readers. These are more ideal for a page like "Kingdom Hearts Wiki:Follow da Rules" or "Kingdom Hearts Wiki:Read or Ban", which I do not recommend.
I recommend the site notice used for temporary wiki-wide notices. For instance, I will be replacing these "please do not" lines with a notice on a "spring cleaning session" soon. BLUER一番 12:03, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
- I've tried to condense the lines down to two with hopefully nicer tone, and specifically reworded the fanart restriction to one that encourages it, but drives traffic towards the fanon wiki (two bonuses!). Is this acceptable?Glorious CHAOS! 15:57, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
- but I'm not sure why we should give the fanon wiki a spot in the limelight, especially when I can't find any linking back to this wiki from there. Also, most of these links are already in the sidebar. For one, the advice to refer to "Wiki Guidelines" could be placed in the Editing page whenever anyone presses the "Edit this page" link/tab, that we could do.
- I understand to whom and for what these messages are aiming for, and while this is so much better, I would like these removed altogether. We have these links pointed out in the sidebar already. Registered users can already see them in the Welcome message, and anons can register if they're serious in editing. And as for that fanon link... until the Fanon wiki links back to us, I don't think we should be giving them free spotlight across the wiki.
- Oh, and I'm adding the deletion notice until the time is up. BLUER一番 13:50, November 18, 2009 (UTC)
