User talk:Kingdomking: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "==Explaining names and titles== A lot of your edits regarding Organization titles, abilities, attacks, forms, etc. are either a bit of a stretch/speculative, or so obvious there's no point in describing it. "''The name Fire Raid refers the keyblades aura of flames as well as most of the combo throwing the keyblades around.''" is quite obvious and not something which needs to be explained on the page. "''Roxas’s title within the Organization is a reference to his elemen...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Explaining names and titles== | ==Explaining names and titles== | ||
A lot of your edits regarding Organization titles, abilities, attacks, forms, etc. are either a bit of a stretch/speculative, or | A lot of your edits regarding Organization titles, abilities, attacks, forms, etc. are either a bit of a stretch/speculative, or there's not really a point in describing it 'cause it's a given/obvious. "''The name Fire Raid refers the keyblades aura of flames as well as most of the combo throwing the keyblades around.''" is quite obvious and not something which needs to be explained on the page. "''Roxas’s title within the Organization is a reference to his element of light [...]''" the title The Key of Destiny is hardly a reference to his affiliation with light. Also, these edits do not belong in the design sections as that's for describing a character's appearance. If anything they should be a part of the introduction, but again, most of these are not really necessary unfortunately. - {{User:JTD95/Signature}} 13:15, 29 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
== Warning == | |||
{{Warning|reason="edit warring and lack of ability to listen"|Despite being told that your recent edits are not up to the wiki's standard you keep on committing to re-inserting them onto pages after being reverted multiple times. If you strongly believe that your edits should be added to the wiki then the correct course of action is to make a discussion out of it. Not to re-insert it. Especially not when when staff has reverted your edits and provided explanations for doing so on several occasions. | |||
:You are welcome to try and help the wiki in other meaningful ways (many pages have notices at the top of things in need for improvement), but if you keep up this style and behavior of editing you will see yourself blocked at the end of it. | |||
: {{User:JTD95/Signature}} 08:54, 5 June 2023 (UTC)}} | |||
{{Warning2|reason=continuing behvior despite being warned|This is your final warning. If you continue to make these kinds of edits, you will be blocked. If you feel this kind of information should be on these pages, you can start a discussion on one of the pages' talk pages, or start a forum. {{User:TheSilentHero/Sig}} 11:39, 14 June 2023 (UTC)}} | |||
Latest revision as of 11:39, 14 June 2023
Explaining names and titles[edit]
A lot of your edits regarding Organization titles, abilities, attacks, forms, etc. are either a bit of a stretch/speculative, or there's not really a point in describing it 'cause it's a given/obvious. "The name Fire Raid refers the keyblades aura of flames as well as most of the combo throwing the keyblades around." is quite obvious and not something which needs to be explained on the page. "Roxas’s title within the Organization is a reference to his element of light [...]" the title The Key of Destiny is hardly a reference to his affiliation with light. Also, these edits do not belong in the design sections as that's for describing a character's appearance. If anything they should be a part of the introduction, but again, most of these are not really necessary unfortunately. - Joseph Thorn Dalton XCV
13:15, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
Warning[edit]
I'm not laughing!
| |
 |
This is a warning for "edit warring and lack of ability to listen".
Your edits have been reverted; please do not attempt to repeat them. — Despite being told that your recent edits are not up to the wiki's standard you keep on committing to re-inserting them onto pages after being reverted multiple times. If you strongly believe that your edits should be added to the wiki then the correct course of action is to make a discussion out of it. Not to re-insert it. Especially not when when staff has reverted your edits and provided explanations for doing so on several occasions.
|
I said, hands off!
| |
 |
|
