Forum:Staff Election

Forums: Index > The World that Never was > Staff Election

TheFifteenthMember Yes. You're creepy. I can't say we'll miss you while you're gone, so it'd be best if you did go. We all win that way. — TheFifteenthMember 19:16, 12 September 2014 (UTC) In September's roundtable, we couldn't come to a conclusion whether we wanted the staff election or not. Instead, we decided to open a petition to help us judge. If it receives many votes, we'll interpret the positive reaction as a "yes" to having a staff election. If the result is underwhelming, the election will not go on. To clarify, this petition will only decide whether we want an election or not in the first place. It's not deciding who will be the new staff members. If an election happens, it'll be the current staff ultimately deciding that. To sum up: if you are in favour of a staff election, add your signature below. EDIT: We're implementing a new system. Now, you can vote for or against so everyone should get involved and voice their opinion.

Votes

FOR

1. TheFifteenthMember
2. KeybladeSpyMaster
3. RikutheBloody

Discussion

Should we have a "Votes FOR" and "Votes AGAINST" or keep it as it is now? TheFifteenthMember 19:16, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

I think the former, as it gives opportunity to voice why not. We'll also be able to tell the difference between not wanting an election, and general site inactivity. KeybladeSpyMaster 19:29, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Done. TheFifteenthMember 19:40, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Remind me, what called this on? What projects need "staff power" help? Chainoffire 19:59, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

There hasn't been a particular ignition trigger, however with more staff leaving/becoming inactive, an extra helping hand would be useful to slightly relieve the workload of the current staff. TheFifteenthMember 20:08, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Imo, any respected and well known community member should be able to apply for a staff position at any time (with an obvious limit to how often you can apply), it's then up to the community to decide to be for it or against it. No special elections should be needed, it's just a bureaucratic speed bump. Sove 20:33, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

I want to re-iterate that I only asked this (originally) in part to see if the staff felt they needed the extra help, even if it's temporarily. So, in part, I'd especially like to hear/see the staff's opinions/feelings toward this. The other part is, as mentioned, because of some projects (the first one that comes to mind being this one) extensively require the help of the staff, but it's being done by several users, and then left to one or two staff members to complete. Not to mention, Kingdom Hearts HD 2.5 ReMIX is coming out soon, and with all the new content from Kingdom Hearts Re:coded, we're gonna need help. But again, this relies on whether or not the staff feels they don't have any pressure/burden. KeybladeSpyMaster 22:05, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

I personally think that it should be FM. He has made so many edits, formats the grammar/writing on each page, and does what the staff members DON'T do. The king (KSM) on the other hand, pretty much takes off where Kyrten left of. He designs the theme, and is basically the "leader" here, doing what staff members should do. Basically, I think of him as a staff member already, but I agree that he should become a staff member. Or FM, but likely the king (KSM). RikutheBloody12:24, 13 September 2014 (UTC)