Forum:Re: Coded and Re: CoM Articles

Forums: Index > The World that Never was > Re: Coded and Re: CoM Articles

AlVan - I'm the leading man, you know. TALK - {{{time}}} This page and this page are built very differently for some reason. Re:CoM's is more like the Final Mixes where it has a list of differences from the original game, whereas Re: Coded's is built like a normal game page. So should we keep it like it is, change Re:Coded's to Re:CoM's style, vice-versa, or a combination of both? When I say combination of both I mean make it like a normal game article along with the list of differences or perhaps making a page by itself for the list of differences.

Pea14733 Freeze! — 10:40, 14 July 2011 (EDT) I think we shouldn't change them. Because Re:coded is entirely different from coded(if not count the plot), making it feels like it is a different game. Re:CoM, on the other hand, still has the same battle system as CoM.

KrytenKoro - "That's when we bumped into Hannity. Sean Hannity. See the thing about this dude is, at first he's fair, right? And you're like "Wow!" But then BOOM. The dude's balanced, too. And you're like, HOLY SHIT." TALK - The re-released games should not have plot synopsis, unless it's a new scene, so that can go. They should have an introduction, a section on announcement and development, and a section on major changes (gameplay and matrix system for Re:coded, for example). Next, a comprehensive list of all changes, organized by type, and finally, a screenshot gallery and a packaging gallery. Each re-released game is going to need this. That's a general overview, and specific sections can be hashed out on those articles' talk pages.