[dismiss]
Site Notice

Remember to pay a visit to our Discord server and chat with our community! See here for more info.

Be sure to check out the KHUX Wiki for the latest on Kingdom Hearts Union χ and Kingdom Hearts Dark Road! Go and pitch in!

The KHWiki contains spoilers for all Kingdom Hearts games. Read at your own risk.

Please remember not to add information about unreleased games from trailers.

Forum:Re: Coded and Re: CoM Articles: Difference between revisions

From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:


{{Pea14733|time=10:40, 14 July 2011 (EDT)|text= I think we shouldn't change them. Because Re:coded is entirely different from coded(if not count the plot), making it feels like it is a different game. Re:CoM, on the other hand, still has the same battle system as CoM. }}
{{Pea14733|time=10:40, 14 July 2011 (EDT)|text= I think we shouldn't change them. Because Re:coded is entirely different from coded(if not count the plot), making it feels like it is a different game. Re:CoM, on the other hand, still has the same battle system as CoM. }}
{{KrytenKoro|The re-released games should not have plot synopsis, unless it's a new scene, so that can go.
They should have an introduction, a section on announcement and development, and a section on major changes (gameplay and matrix system for Re:coded, for example). Next, a comprehensive list of all changes, organized by type, and finally, a screenshot gallery and a packaging gallery. Each re-released game is going to need this.
That's a general overview, and specific sections can be hashed out on those articles' talk pages.}}

Revision as of 17:02, 14 July 2011

KHWiki-Forum Logo.png
Forums: Index > The World that Never was > Re: Coded and Re: CoM Articles


Balthier-ffxii-render.png
AlVan - I'm the leading man, you know.
TALK - {{{time}}}
This page and this page are built very differently for some reason. Re:CoM's is more like the Final Mixes where it has a list of differences from the original game, whereas Re: Coded's is built like a normal game page. So should we keep it like it is, change Re:Coded's to Re:CoM's style, vice-versa, or a combination of both? When I say combination of both I mean make it like a normal game article along with the list of differences or perhaps making a page by itself for the list of differences.


Blizzard (card).png
Pea14733 Freeze! — 10:40, 14 July 2011 (EDT)
BlizzardRCOBlue.png I think we shouldn't change them. Because Re:coded is entirely different from coded(if not count the plot), making it feels like it is a different game. Re:CoM, on the other hand, still has the same battle system as CoM.
209.png
KrytenKoro - Click
TALK -
The re-released games should not have plot synopsis, unless it's a new scene, so that can go.

They should have an introduction, a section on announcement and development, and a section on major changes (gameplay and matrix system for Re:coded, for example). Next, a comprehensive list of all changes, organized by type, and finally, a screenshot gallery and a packaging gallery. Each re-released game is going to need this.

That's a general overview, and specific sections can be hashed out on those articles' talk pages.

Retrieved from "https://www.khwiki.com/index.php?title=Forum:Re:_Coded_and_Re:_CoM_Articles&oldid=504806"