3,310
edits
Talk:Ifrit: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
LapisScarab (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{Dan da Man36|time=18:45, July 16, 2010 (UTC)|lion=I thought we agreed that Etymology sections were going to be merged into Design sections, like we did for Project Enemy. Omega Trinity's Etymology section hasn't been merged '''yet''' by the looks of things.}} | {{Dan da Man36|time=18:45, July 16, 2010 (UTC)|lion=I thought we agreed that Etymology sections were going to be merged into Design sections, like we did for Project Enemy. Omega Trinity's Etymology section hasn't been merged '''yet''' by the looks of things.}} | ||
{{LapisScarab|time=18:47, July 16, 2010 (UTC)|text=The etymology is a feature of the design. That's the reason I was given. Why does it matter if it has its own section? The etymology is still there, just under the Design section. There ''shouldn't'' be one on Omega Trinity, it should be part of the Design too.}} | {{LapisScarab|time=18:47, July 16, 2010 (UTC)|text=The etymology is a feature of the design. That's the reason I was given. Why does it matter if it has its own section? The etymology is still there, just under the Design section. There ''shouldn't'' be one on Omega Trinity, it should be part of the Design too.}} | ||
{{LA|Vtext=>> | |||
So, in other words, perfectly fine edits are being reverted because of a stupid policy. | |||
This is getting sickeningly old. <!--</TNE>-->}} | |||