Talk:Ifrit: Difference between revisions
From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
SilverCrono (talk | contribs) |
Dan da Man36 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{LA|Vtext=What's wrong with Etymology sections?! There's clearly enough information to put it there! We're just going to keep adding it and edit warring if this doesn't stop! Can someone please just provide a decent reason as to why there can be an Etymology section on a vague subject such as [[Omega Trinity]], but not a weapon article obviously named '''Ifrit'''? And I'd like a little more than "It's a part of the design" please. That isn't a very good reason. If you're going to do this, then we might as well abolish every Etymology section on the wiki, because it certainly applies here!}} | {{LA|Vtext=What's wrong with Etymology sections?! There's clearly enough information to put it there! We're just going to keep adding it and edit warring if this doesn't stop! Can someone please just provide a decent reason as to why there can be an Etymology section on a vague subject such as [[Omega Trinity]], but not a weapon article obviously named '''Ifrit'''? And I'd like a little more than "It's a part of the design" please. That isn't a very good reason. If you're going to do this, then we might as well abolish every Etymology section on the wiki, because it certainly applies here!}} | ||
{{SC|time=18:35, July 16, 2010 (UTC)|mad=I tried to implement them, but apparently, they only apply too characters. Don't ask me, I 100% agree with you. >:(}} | {{SC|time=18:35, July 16, 2010 (UTC)|mad=I tried to implement them, but apparently, they only apply too characters. Don't ask me, I 100% agree with you. >:(}} | ||
{{Dan da Man36|time=18:45, July 16, 2010 (UTC)|lion=I thought we agreed that Etymology sections were going to be merged into Design sections, like we did for Project Enemy. Omega Trinity's Etymology section hasn't been merged '''yet''' by the looks of things.}} | |||
Revision as of 18:45, 16 July 2010
I've had enough of this!
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What's wrong with Etymology sections?! There's clearly enough information to put it there! We're just going to keep adding it and edit warring if this doesn't stop! Can someone please just provide a decent reason as to why there can be an Etymology section on a vague subject such as 
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I tried to implement them, but apparently, they only apply too characters. Don't ask me, I 100% agree with you. >:(
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I thought we agreed that Etymology sections were going to be merged into Design sections, like we did for Project Enemy. Omega Trinity's Etymology section hasn't been merged yet by the looks of things.
