Template talk:Magazine

Should we move it to "Magazine 1.0" under the new naming schema? TheFifteenthMember 11:20, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

I was under the impression that this page would host the current version of the magazine template, and older versions would be moved to other pages (the version for the first issue would be moved to Magazine 1.0, but v. 2.0 would be hosted on this page). KeybladeSpyMaster 17:45, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

I thought that too, and then "Template:Magazine 2.0" was created. Which method should we follow then? I prefer doing what you said. TheFifteenthMember 21:20, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, I was contemplating the same things and just went with 2.0 for the launch and figured we would sort it out later. :P If we're gonna go with archiving to 1.0 etc, then it seems kind of pointless to me to not name the current template 2.0, cause that's just gonna end up being it's name in the future anyway. If we archive, how about just going with the old Template:Magazine/Archive 1? Let me know what you guys wanna do cause we'll make the same changes over on the Keyhole. FINALREST 09:20, 8 October 2014 (UTC)