Editing Talk:Tigger

{{Falcos|text= Is it really necesary to have that "spelling" joke in the original paragraph? In my opinion, it just makes the page look unprofessional and un-wiki-worthy.}}
{{KrytenKoro|emotion=ohwell|It's...It's Tigger, man. C'mon.}}
{{LapisScarab|time=14:27, August 6, 2010 (UTC)|text=Besides, the way he pronounces it like that is reflective of his personality<!--Yay rationalization!-->.}}
{{Falcos|text= Maybe I'm jaded, not ever having been exposed to Winnie The Pooh, and personally detesting all of the characters and settings, but I think that it's jarring compared to the near-professional standard of most of this wiki. Also, I don't think the fact that it's reflective of his personality is really good enough rationalization, as no other character has something like that in the opening line of their page. Put it in a quote, if you must.}}
{{LapisScarab|time=18:46, August 6, 2010 (UTC)|text=It is reflective of his nature as a child's (Christopher Robin's) imaginary friend/character/what have you. That and it ''is'' the way he pronounces his name. There's no joke to be found in the article, it's just a piece of information about one of Tigger's habits, like Axel's "Got it memorized?".}}
{{Falcos|text= It is a joke, a joke told in-game, but a joke none the less. However, if you take it as just a habit, I would like to ask what would happen if someone decided to put "Got it memorized?" or something similar into the "Axel" page's opening sentence instead of in a quote like it is now, and then defended it with "It's Axel. Get over it."}}
{{LapisScarab|time=19:05, August 6, 2010 (UTC)|text=Alright, I concede that it isn't quite the same as Axel's catchphrase. It's less of a verbal tick, and more just the way his name is pronounced/spelled. It is a joke within the context of tigger's scenes, but it is ''not'' a joke in the article. It's a statement. If the sentence were worded like this: '''Tigger, spelled T-I-double-guh-ER, blah blah blah.''' it would indeed be unprofessional. But it's not. It's '''Tigger, spelled T-I-double-guh-ER by Tigger himself, blah blah blah'''. The "by Tigger himself" bit makes it clear that the spelling is a trait of Tigger's, not just a joke the article's author(s) are using. I'm giving you plenty more reasons than "It's Tigger, get over it".}}
{{Falcos|text= I was actually referring to the reactions I got from Kryten on this page, and someone in the IRC. Anyway, People go to a wiki to gather information, correct? Ergo, you  would want to put relevant, mature information on the wiki for them to access. Now, I ask you, why, in a wiki mostly full of this relevant, mature information, in the forms of well-laid out, well-written pages, is there ONE page that contains an in-joke that makes the whole article seem childish? On any other article, that would be relegated to the "quotes" section, or at least the "Trivia" one. No other article on this, or any good wiki that I know of, has information stated by the character in the main article itself. If people want that info, they would look in Quotes and/or Trivia. I'm not going to change it, but can this article please adhere to the high maturity level of the rest of the wiki?}}
{{LapisScarab|time=19:21, August 6, 2010 (UTC)|text=<!--I am so freaking sick of the IRC. If something concerns the wiki, bring it to the wiki, not somewhere other users can't see it!-->It's a character trait, that ''is'' information. The way it is worded and placed in the article is not immature. The only reason the quote seems immature is because that is the ''point'' of the Winnie the Pooh characters. They are immature. The're literally a children's storybook's characters. But whatever, I really don't feel like debating whether or not Tigger is mature with you. If you want to move it, I have two things to note; 1) Trivia is teh ebils, so we do everything we can to merge trivia points into the article. Don't put it in the trivia. 2) If you put it in the Quotes, be sure to get the whole quote from the game.}}
{{Falcos|AxelDays= Thank you for being willing to budge, here. My last argument had more backing and the other person still didn't listen. Anyway, I've put it as a header quote, so people will still read it first. This is the correct quote, I just went through that cutscene not ten minutes ago. Thanks again for your cooperation.}}
{{KrytenKoro|1. Holy Crap.

2. It. Is. Tigger.

3. It. Is. Tigger. In. A. Game. Meant. For. Small. Children.}}

{{Falcos|AxelCoM= 1. What? Holy crap because I'm trying to treat this article like any other article?

2. Yes, it's Tigger. Please explain why that excuses this article looking like it's written by a five year old?

3. By that logic, shouldn't we do something similar with every other character page? "It's Mushu", "It's Genie", "It's Axel", etc.}}

{{LapisScarab|time=13:20, August 7, 2010 (UTC)|text=1) This is argument is done. 2) To Falcos, as I said before, there was nothing unprofessional about the way the article was before, at least in my opinion. 3) Read #1.}}
{{KrytenKoro|Just to explain myself, I guess it was too subtle: if you are writing an article about a nonsensical character, such as Tigger or Spongebob, it is absolutely worthless to write about it as if you were writing a dissection of the themes of poverty and misanthropism in "Great Expectations". It both ''ignores'' what makes the character important, and is absolutely out of tone with the article, making ''the writer'' end up sounding insane.}}