Editing Talk:Shadow Stalker and Dark Thorn
From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Maybe it's assumed due to it's lack of emblem. '''''[[User:Scottch|<span style="color:#00cccc">Scott</span>]][[User talk:Scottch|<span style="color:#ff9900">ch</span>]]''''' 18:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC) | :Maybe it's assumed due to it's lack of emblem. '''''[[User:Scottch|<span style="color:#00cccc">Scott</span>]][[User talk:Scottch|<span style="color:#ff9900">ch</span>]]''''' 18:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
{{ | {{TalkTextTest2 | ||
|image= | |image=DiZ2-ChofMem.png | ||
|color=#000000 | |color=#000000 | ||
|color2=#000000 | |color2=#000000 | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
:JUST THE EXAMPLE I NEEDED! Yeah, what about that? Is that a point-prover right there? --{{User:LegoAlchemist/Sig}} 05:56, June 13, 2010 (UTC) | :JUST THE EXAMPLE I NEEDED! Yeah, what about that? Is that a point-prover right there? --{{User:LegoAlchemist/Sig}} 05:56, June 13, 2010 (UTC) | ||
For the record, I get why the Shadow Stalker and Dark Thorn share a page, just not why the Opposite Armor and Guard armor ''don't''. I'd like to think it's just an oversight.--'''<span style="font-family:papyrus">[[User:LapisScarab|<span style="color:midnightblue;">Lapis</span>]]<span style="color:black;">Scarab</span></span>'''[[File:Chrono Twister | For the record, I get why the Shadow Stalker and Dark Thorn share a page, just not why the Opposite Armor and Guard armor ''don't''. I'd like to think it's just an oversight.--'''<span style="font-family:papyrus">[[User:LapisScarab|<span style="color:midnightblue;">Lapis</span>]]<span style="color:black;">Scarab</span></span>'''[[File:Chrono Twister.png|30px]] 05:58, June 13, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:... crap. Eh, whatever. I'm just going to drop this whole matter. I leave with a final, "THEY'RE TWO FRICKEN HEARTLESS FOR PETE'S SAKE". --{{User:LegoAlchemist/Sig}} 06:12, June 13, 2010 (UTC) | :... crap. Eh, whatever. I'm just going to drop this whole matter. I leave with a final, "THEY'RE TWO FRICKEN HEARTLESS FOR PETE'S SAKE". --{{User:LegoAlchemist/Sig}} 06:12, June 13, 2010 (UTC) | ||
::I can see it being reasonable to merge Opposite Armor and Guard Armor, and possibly Possessor and Massive Possessor. The only problem I see is that "Not all Guard Armor are Opposite Armor" and "Not all Opposite Armor are Guard Armor" (Hades Cup). So, it's certainly possible and logical to merge them, but this, at the least, is a more specific and unique example. | ::I can see it being reasonable to merge Opposite Armor and Guard Armor, and possibly Possessor and Massive Possessor. The only problem I see is that "Not all Guard Armor are Opposite Armor" and "Not all Opposite Armor are Guard Armor" (Hades Cup). So, it's certainly possible and logical to merge them, but this, at the least, is a more specific and unique example. | ||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
The part you said with not all Guard Armors are Opposite Armors also goes for the Possessors. Not all Possessors are Thresholder. - [[User:JTD95|JTD]] 10:42, 16 February 2011 (EST) | The part you said with not all Guard Armors are Opposite Armors also goes for the Possessors. Not all Possessors are Thresholder. - [[User:JTD95|JTD]] 10:42, 16 February 2011 (EST) | ||