Talk:Regen

Untitled

Do we really, truly need this article? You know how I feel about this sort of article... - Eternal Nothingness XIII 10:19, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

Well, I saw it on the Wanted Articles bit and that's why I made it but no, we don't need it. I'llCrushYou!

Then I really think it should be deleted. The "Wanted Articles" list isn't always up-to-date, or even accurate. - Eternal Nothingness XIII 19:22, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

Its a passive ability. Our policy is to give all passive abilities articles, as long as they are formatted properly.Glorious CHAOS! 22:23, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

I concur with KrytenKoro. In addition, EternalNothingnessXIII, some subjects like this one do not have a vast amount of content and information to use, so it does not take as much information to complete the article. --^DTN 05:28, May 11, 2010 (UTC)

Also, the command should be merged back in. The status is a status effect, totally agree to keep that separate, but both the ability and command are things that cause that effect -- the enemy cards in CoM can hardly be said to be distinct from commands anyway, seeing as they are clearly the roots of the command system."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 02:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Etymology

Is it really necessary because I thought it was obvious that Regen came from Regenerate. Even still we could write a short sentence about it in the first paragraph. TheFifteenthMember 18:03, 5 May 2012 (UTC)