| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 9: |
Line 9: |
|
| |
|
| It appears Kingdom Hearts haven't got Oogie's design right. His sack is a bright greyish in the game, but anyone who has seen The Nightmare Before Christmas knows that here, this sack is green. If no one objects I shall add it to the trivia.([[User:Bananaphone1996|Bananaphone1996]] 07:51, May 7, 2010 (UTC)) | | It appears Kingdom Hearts haven't got Oogie's design right. His sack is a bright greyish in the game, but anyone who has seen The Nightmare Before Christmas knows that here, this sack is green. If no one objects I shall add it to the trivia.([[User:Bananaphone1996|Bananaphone1996]] 07:51, May 7, 2010 (UTC)) |
| :Wasn't that just because of the lighting? I object. --[[User:Neumannz|Neumannz]] 03:22, May 9, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| ::It's a regular burlap sack in the movie (and the PS2 sequel), but it has a green tinge so that it would be able to glow in the dark.[[User:KrytenKoro|<small>Glorious</small>]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|<small>CHAOS!</small>]] 04:25, May 9, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Should it be added... ==
| |
|
| |
| that Oogie Boogie is probably the only member of Maleficent's group to prioitise defence, as he never attacks you himself? Also, technically isn't he a heartless, because he swallowed a heart overpowered by darkness.([[Special:Contributions/222.155.89.163|222.155.89.163]] 03:36, May 27, 2010 (UTC))
| |
| :He swallowed a machine designed to control the Heartless, technically.[[User:KrytenKoro|<small>Glorious</small>]] [[User_talk:KrytenKoro|<small>CHAOS!</small>]] 03:45, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
| |
| Also, sorry for sounding unintelligent, but how can Oogie Boogie succumb to darkness? All he is is a pile of bugs wrapped in sacking.([[User:Bananaphone1996|Bananaphone1996]] 04:04, August 23, 2010 (UTC))
| |
| :Scar's a lion and he succumbed to it. Every living (and many apparently unliving) thing in KH has a heart that can be corrupted, with a couple of exceptions like Nobodies, Ven, Vanitas, and the PoH.{{User:LapisScarab/Sig}}06:41, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
| |
|
| |
| == Is it really possible... ==
| |
|
| |
| {{Bananaphone|time=04:13, August 23, 2010 (UTC)|text=That Oogie Boogie will be coming back in future installmets. I keep trying to get rid of that statement, and someone keeps bringing it back. The only reason he came back last time was Maleficent brought him back. If she didn't, he would still be dead. And Maleficent won't ever bring Oogie Boogie back due to how he treated her.}}
| |
| {{KrytenKoro|That last sentence there is probably why your edit is being reverted. It's 100% speculation.
| |
|
| |
| Reading the trivia point, it would be perfectly in line with TNBC canon for Oogie to come back, so there's no real reason he couldn't.}}
| |
| {{LapisScarab|time=06:39, August 23, 2010 (UTC)|skinny=It's a pretty vague statement. Any villain could come back if Maleficent wanted them to, i.e. it's not something unique to Oogie. Doesn't that make it un-trivia worthy?}}
| |
| {{KrytenKoro|Probably. I think it started off as "Donald squished the brain bug, so he is gone forever", and people tried to correct it from there.}}
| |
|
| |
| {{Bananaphone|time=03:49, August 26, 2010 (UTC)|text=But why would Maleficent bring back Oogie when he was such a jackass to her? Isn't that the only way he can come back? And that 'Brain Bug' statement is starting to get to me. What makes everyone think this was his brain bug. It was no different to the millions of other bugs inside him. Any one of those bugs could have been his brain bug, so how do we know that was his brain bug?}}
| |
|
| |
| == "Optional" boss? ==
| |
|
| |
| Why is Oogie Boogie included in [[:Category:Optional bosses]]? There are several other bosses included in that category that don't really seem to fit, this is just the first one I noticed. -[[Special:Contributions/66.87.121.142|66.87.121.142]] 18:36, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
| |
| :Guess because you don't need to complete Halloween Town to complete the first game.--[[Special:Contributions/87.205.53.187|87.205.53.187]] 19:10, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
| |
| ::That, yeah. He's completely optional by any coherent definition.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 16:16, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
| |
