Talk:Doc (ability)
Wouldn't it make more sense to mention this variation on the main Cure page, instead of having a completely seperate article? Same for the other Dwarf Commands and any similar ones (I think Cinderella does the same thing.).LapisLazuliScarab19:17, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree. This is needless. maggosh 19:23, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Thirded. --Ag (Silver) - 47 107.8682 amu ~Crono
20:36, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
- I agree too, but instead of being mentioned in the respective magic spell, why not just mention it on the D-Link page instead?Erry 20:41, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
- This, Vanitas, and Cinderella each have purely D-Link-specific commands. Do we want to mention them as part of the D-Link pages? Especially since all of them but Vanitas's are clones of normal commands, I think.(ಠ_ೃ) Bully! 20:49, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
- There isn't really a place for that on the D-Link table, and not all of the D-Links have commands like this.LapisLazuliScarab20:47, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
- I agree too, but instead of being mentioned in the respective magic spell, why not just mention it on the D-Link page instead?Erry 20:41, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
- We mean the Game:Vanitas (D-Link) page. The D-Links should eventually have their own pages which cover the abilities, obtainment, and commands, I think. The D-Link table is kind of too scrunched, even before Oasis.(ಠ_ೃ) Bully! 20:49, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Thirded. --Ag (Silver) - 47 107.8682 amu ~Crono
Ah, in that case, yes, it would be better to put them on the D-Link pages.LapisLazuliScarab20:53, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
- I agree that the D-Links need their own page, but do we have enough info? And how would we format them? I'll be happy to help out, but I don't want to start any pages and make you guys have to tear them apart because I fail <_< --Ag (Silver) - 47 107.8682 amu ~Crono 20:55, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
- EDIT: I'm gonna start on the Game:Vanitas (D-Link) page, and see if I can work something out for it to look good. --Ag (Silver) - 47 107.8682 amu ~Crono 20:56, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
Alright, I made Game:Pete (D-Link) and buffed up Game:Vanitas (D-Link). What do you guys think? Should I make the pages for the rest of the D-Links? --Ag (Silver) - 47 107.8682 amu ~Crono 
21:50, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
if wer'e gonna be doing separated page for vantas and pete d-link, shouldn't we do the same for the other?
This spell functions more like Group Cure than normal Cure. When used Doc causes a green ring to surround you as your healed. The only other healing spells that do that (in BBS at least) are Group Cure, Group Cura, and Group Curaga. --Evnyofdeath 22:52, October 25, 2010 (UTC)
@UnknownChaser: It's being done. Making 15-ish pages to hold all this info, and format it correctly, and get all the info not found in the wiki doesn't just happen in a second. People have lives, and making these pages takes time. so, no, they haven't all been made yet, because nobody on here is a super-user. I'd like to see you make a around 15 high-quality pages in less than a day. --Ag (Silver) - 47 107.8682 amu ~Crono 22:58, October 25, 2010 (UTC)
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
