53,710
edits
No edit summary |
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
Except, saying the child is known as Kiara is the same as accepting the "assumption" of having the article named Kiara. The same is true if we keep the origin, it's accepting that the child is Kiara, which we're supposedly rejecting on the basis that there's no proof in the games that it's actually Kiara. I don't think it's necessary to move it. After all, ''Kingdom Hearts'' builds on the Disney universe, it doesn't recreate it. There's nothing wrong with leaving it as Kiara because it's a safely-accepted fact. It might get more confusing and weird to deny that it's Kiara, even if there's nothing in the actual games that says it is. {{KeybladeSpyMaster/Sig}} 23:31, 13 July 2014 (UTC) | Except, saying the child is known as Kiara is the same as accepting the "assumption" of having the article named Kiara. The same is true if we keep the origin, it's accepting that the child is Kiara, which we're supposedly rejecting on the basis that there's no proof in the games that it's actually Kiara. I don't think it's necessary to move it. After all, ''Kingdom Hearts'' builds on the Disney universe, it doesn't recreate it. There's nothing wrong with leaving it as Kiara because it's a safely-accepted fact. It might get more confusing and weird to deny that it's Kiara, even if there's nothing in the actual games that says it is. {{KeybladeSpyMaster/Sig}} 23:31, 13 July 2014 (UTC) | ||
== Needs to be merged into Pride Lands or renamed "Simba and Nala's cub" == | |||
The kana, as far as I can tell, are fake.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 13:25, 5 July 2018 (UTC) |
edits