7,364
edits
Talk:Simba and Nala's cub: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
::::Does that mean we have to remove the Origins section, too? I worked really hard on it. T _ T--{{User:NinjaSheik/Sig}} 19:27, 13 July 2014 (UTC) | ::::Does that mean we have to remove the Origins section, too? I worked really hard on it. T _ T--{{User:NinjaSheik/Sig}} 19:27, 13 July 2014 (UTC) | ||
No, the origin section is still needed. However, the page needs to be rewritten under the examples on [[Shark]] and [[Maleficent's Raven]]. So, the opening line of the origin section would be something like: "Simba's child, known as '''Kiara''' [http://movies.disney.com/the-lion-king-2-simbas-pride ref], originates from the ''{{w|The Lion King}}'' and its sequel ''{{w|The Lion King II}}''." {{User:Xion4ever/Sig}} 19:49, 13 July 2014 (UTC) | No, the origin section is still needed. However, the page needs to be rewritten under the examples on [[Shark]] and [[Maleficent's Raven]]. So, the opening line of the origin section would be something like: "Simba's child, known as '''Kiara''' [http://movies.disney.com/the-lion-king-2-simbas-pride ref], originates from the ''{{w|The Lion King}}'' and its sequel ''{{w|The Lion King II}}''." {{User:Xion4ever/Sig}} 19:49, 13 July 2014 (UTC) | ||
Except, saying the child is known as Kiara is the same as accepting the "assumption" of having the article named Kiara. The same is true if we keep the origin, it's accepting that the child is Kiara, which we're supposedly rejecting on the basis that there's no proof in the games that it's actually Kiara. I don't think it's necessary to move it. After all, ''Kingdom Hearts'' builds on the Disney universe, it doesn't recreate it. There's nothing wrong with leaving it as Kiara because it's a safely-accepted fact. It might get more confusing and weird to deny that it's Kiara, even if there's nothing in the actual games that says it is. {{KeybladeSpyMaster/Sig}} 23:31, 13 July 2014 (UTC) | |||