automoderated
15,833
edits
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 378: | Line 378: | ||
{{RikutheBloody|time={{User:Master Riku the Bloody/Sig1}} 01:07, 4 December 2014 (UTC)|text=Not that I have a problem against it, (I prefer the new ones anyway.) I just thought sense they were action renders, they go on the boss page. I had no Idea that they were modded by an editor. And also does that mean we should delete them, since we wont use them on any other page.}} | {{RikutheBloody|time={{User:Master Riku the Bloody/Sig1}} 01:07, 4 December 2014 (UTC)|text=Not that I have a problem against it, (I prefer the new ones anyway.) I just thought sense they were action renders, they go on the boss page. I had no Idea that they were modded by an editor. And also does that mean we should delete them, since we wont use them on any other page.}} | ||
{{EO|time=01:15, 4 December 2014 (UTC)|thinking=I've always been apposed to the existence of those images on the Wiki. They serve no real purpose, other than to show a now inactive user's ability to animate the games' renders. They are merely inferior to the official renders; I think that favoring our users' material over what is provided to us by Square Enix makes us seem a bit full of ourselves, to tell the truth. We're basically saying, "Look what we did, guys!" The official images aren't being used on any articles other than character galleries, and that's not okay with me. All I know is whenever I tried to replace the unofficial renders in the past, those who were too attached to the fan-posed ones kept saying, "We don't care about the policy. It doesn't apply to boss pages because I say so." I think the user was KrytenKoro, who also is now inactive. Images such as the ones of Xemnas's dragon form are perfectly fine for use on the article, since it illustrates something Square Enix has provided us no official image for. But to use a fan-posed T-render of Xemnas over the official renders from ''KHII'' and ''Days'', that is truly inappropriate to me. Gameplay articles where we list boss strategies and such are still articles, no matter what their content. Otherwise they would not be in mainspace, where we use ONLY OFFICIAL MATERIAL, last time I checked. "They're higher quality" and "They look cooler" are not good enough excuses, to me at least, to justify the use of the "action renders."}} |