KHWiki:Pages for deletion/Archives/Full archive

maleficent2

• I'm a little torn - several of these were cohorts of Maleficent's, although "council" is probably inaccurate. At the very least it should be moved, but a compendium of KH2 Disney bosses would be of benefit. Scottch 14:22, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Template:Disney. Could use a better name. Interrobang 14:40, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
    • To avoid cluttering, maybe both maleficent and maleficent2 should just be redirected to that. The template could always be moved... maybe {{disneyvillains}}? Scottch 14:44, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
      • Bleh, works for me. I just overcategorize stuff. Council on the second one? That was my bad. Heh... I guess it pays to double check. I just played Kingdom Hearts over again, and Clayton doesn't work with the first template. The rest on the first template, though, are completely accurate.--Dreyfus 04:11, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Closed

The result was merge to disneyvillains. Scottch 19:21, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Category:Fantasia

• I say delete, not enough material for an article. Scottch 14:22, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Closed

The result was delete. Scottch 19:22, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Category:Pure Heartless

• Is there a source for this deletion? If so I'm cool with it. Scottch 14:22, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
  • [1] Interrobang 14:40, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Closed

The result was rename to Category:Pureblood Heartless. Scottch 19:24, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Category:Artificial Heartless

• Same as above. Scottch 14:22, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Wikipedia noted the Pure and Artificial Heartless.--Dreyfus 01:42, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
    • The dispute is over the name I think, not the existence. Scottch 21:19, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Closed

The result was rename to Category:Emblem Heartless. Scottch 19:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Movie categories

This is a lump nomination of all categories of the name of a Disney movie. It seems like the world category (i.e. Atlantica instead of The Little Mermaid) is enough categorization, other wise it's redundant. Scottch 21:18, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - nominator. Scottch 21:21, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - nominator. Which is ironic, because I was the original creator of them, though eventually I stopped using 'em.--Dreyfus 04:12, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Closed

The result was delete. Scottch 06:48, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Category:Places

This seems redundant to Category:Worlds, is there a difference? Scottch 21:21, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - nominator. Scottch 21:21, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Changed to keep Scottch 04:21, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
• Neutral - no nomination. This isn't redundant; there is a difference. "Worlds" works with worlds. But what about, say, "Castle that Never Was?" Worlds are places, but so are actual places within a world. But I can see what you are saying; it all depends on how general or specific you want to be.
  • At least they shouldn't have both categories. I'll post a thread at the portal about parent categories and such. Scottch 23:29, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
    • How would it be to use just one category or another, and not both on any single article, to avoid redundancy? Scottch 07:12, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Category:Other

This is only a parent category, doesn't seem real useful. Scottch 21:33, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - nominator. Scottch 21:33, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
• Neutral - no nomination. For somethings it is unuseful, but others, such as Magic or Save Space. There really isn't anywhere else to put them.--Dreyfus 04:16, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Magic can go under abilities. Save points... I'm not sure, but there has to be somehting better than "other", or we wouldn't need categories ;-) Scottch 23:30, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
    • What about a rename to "Game elements"? Scottch 18:46, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Closed

The result was rename to Category:Game elements (discussion elsewhere). Scottch 07:13, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Category:Keyblade Masters

This seems a little overdone, there's only 3 unless you count Kairi. I don't think a category is needed, personally. Scottch 21:43, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - nominator. Scottch 21:43, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - nominator.--Dreyfus 04:21, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Closed

Closed as delete. Scottch 07:30, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Shan Yu and Hayabusa.jpg OR Image:Shan Yu.jpg

One of these has to go, we don't need both for fair use. Scottch 19:41, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete first - second one in color looks better. Scottch 19:41, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Closed

The result was delete the first Scottch 06:36, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Category:Vault Disney

Not really relevant to the series in my opinion. Scottch 19:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete due to above. Scottch 19:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Closed

The result was delete Scottch 06:42, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Category:Radiant Garden - merge into Category:Hollow Bastion

"Hollow Bastion" is what it is known by for almost all of the series, so why not associate the pages to that? Scottch 21:03, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

• Merge as above. Scottch 21:03, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Closed

The result was merge Scottch 06:42, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Category:Villains

This seems redundant to Category:Enemies, is there any difference? Scottch 00:49, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - unless some difference is shown, I might just be overlooking the difference. Scottch 00:49, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - The difference is that "Villains" is more specific; like Bosses. To be a villain, one must be both a character and an enemy, AND have a prominent role in the story (i.e. Zexion, Maleficent, Ansem, Seeker of Darkness, and Master Control Program).--Dreyfus 22:20, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Wouldn't that be covered in both parent and lesser categories though? That makes "villains" a combo of both the "enemies" and "characters" categories, but that can be further broken down into "Disney bosses", "Organization XIII" etc. Categories like that - that come from mixing two categories, but still branching off - are pretty awkward in my opinion. Scottch 10:25, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Closed

The result was no consensus - so, it stays. Scottch 03:45, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Sitar, Chakrams and other weapon articles

All these pages say is that they are used by their respective owners, which is already mentioned in Demyx, Axel, et al. They should be redirected to those articles or they'll be completely redundant. Scottch 05:44, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

• Redirect - as above. Scottch 05:44, 15 January 2007 (UTC)Changed to merge, Hecko X's idea is better. Scottch 18:52, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
• Merge into an article simply entitled "Weapons" or "List of Weapons". --Hecko X 13:57, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
  • This is a better idea, actually. Scottch 18:52, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Closed

The result was merge. Scottch 03:46, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Ansem Report individual pages

This is Ansem Reports 1, Ansem Report 2 etc. All they are currently is copyvios, I don't think there's any need for seperate articles. Copying the text verbatim is a copyright violation, so I say redirect to Ansem Reports.

• Redirect as above. Scottch 06:27, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect. WOAH! I never knew this was in the pages when I made the Ansem's Report article! What a coincidence! Uh... I'd say that either they are redirected to Ansem's Report, or otherwise (see the article's discussion page).--Dreyfus 21:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Closed

CLosed as redirect Scottch 03:43, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Kingdom Hearts III

Everything is based on rumors and theories with absolutely nothing substancial. If someone wrote the almost exact opposite it could be just as true. It is misleading and until more information has been verified, serves absolutely no purpose (but to mislead).

• Delete - for above reasons. --Hecko X 14:09, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
• Unsure - the article really does suck, but so do several others. We don't necessarily have content guidelines set up, but I anticipate people will be okay with adding a lot of info about the gaming population's theories - it does target that audience after all - but that article is particularly heinous and treats it all as fact when it most certainly is not. It's an article we should have, but not anything close to its current state. If this does get "deleted", I'll move it to my userspace and leave it up for editing for that reason. What's it's presentable I'll move it back, and if people don't want a KHIII article up at all, it'll have to be re-nominated. Scottch 18:56, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
• Rewrite - This article should be here, but not in the state it is now. -Painocus
• Rewrite - This article should be given a conjecture template (I'm about to make it), and should be rewritten to include only the KNOWN or SUGGESTED facts from the media, etc. Not anything guessed.--Dreyfus 22:02, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Then the article will be reduced to: "The main characters will not be Sora, Riku or Kairi, but original characters.", which is kind of a waste (which is why it might as well be deleted, in my oppinion). Other than that, nothing is confirmed. Noone even knows if it will be an actual game (it's Advent Children all over again).
    • O_O No Sora!? I think I'm going to cry...--Dreyfus 00:53, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
      • As I know it has never bin said that Sora and the others is not the main characters, only that they are not the three characters in the KH2's secret ending.-Painocus
        • Even better, then we have absolutely nothing to go on, besides that. --Hecko X 22:42, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Closed

I'm going to get this out of main namespace and put it in User:Scottch/KHIII. Anyone can edit it from there, and once it's ready, anyone can relist it here or go the community portal to see if there are any objections to moving it back. Scottch 03:44, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Hayabusa

Seems like this could be merged with Shan-Yu - not really an independent character. Scottch 06:56, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

• Merge - as nominator. Scottch 06:56, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Closed

The result was Merge. Scottch 16:49, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Rising Sun, Overtaker, Berserk, etc.

All of them are Reaction commands (the c in "command" should be uppercase, btw), and as such, won't be able to get past maybe 2-4 lines. It's basically a waste of space for all of them to have independant articles. It would be more efficient to merge them into the Reaction Command article, with redirects leading to it, i.e. Berserk redirects to Reaction command#Berserk

• Merge for above reasons. --Hecko X 07:59, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
• Unsure - however, section redirects don't work on Wikia, only on Wikipedia. Scottch 10:25, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Then let them redirect to Reaction Command The important part is that they should merged. --Hecko X 11:25, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
• Merge - might be nice to expand into full articles eventually, but, I can easily see these pages getting abandoned. Let's get the more important stuff down first. Scottch 20:47, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Closed

The result was merge. Scottch 16:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Animal Characters category

First of all, let me say that if the following circumstances didn't apply, then I'd be perfectly fine with this category. Anyway... I think this category should be deleted. It is a bit too general; same thing with Human Characters. Almost every single character is either a human character or an animal character (not to mention that all humans are animals). And since everybody seems to be against me in giving them both Character AND <blahblahblah> Character categories, that would just render the Character category almost obsolete. I mean, can YOU think of a character that is neither Human nor Animal? The only ones I can think of are some of the characters in the 100 Acre Wood and the characters in Space Paranoids. Everything else is either a Heartless, a Nobody, a Human, or a Non-Human animal!

• Delete OR Keep - For the above reasons. I'll say Keep if we can include both "Character" and "_____ Character" categories.--Dreyfus 04:34, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment - Parent categories, even if empty of articles, are still helpful in category organization using the category tree. If subcategories have "[[Category:Characters]]" in them, they'll be organized as sub-categories, and the links to those subcategories will be at the top of the parent category links. See Category:Items to see what I mean. Other than that, I'm unsure about it. Scottch 01:42, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Closed

The result was no consensus. Scottch 16:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Kingdom Hearts 3 Clues

I was tempted to speedy delete this, since it's more of a directive than an informative article... also very short, and "clues" is just going to be opinionated stuff anyway. However, I suppose some might think it has potential even if it has not much content now, so I thought I'd put it up here.

• Delete as nominator. Scottch 06:50, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Closed

The author was posting pasted info from another website, advertising for that website, and removing the "up for deletion notice", so I speedy deleted it. Since it was listed here, anyone can tell me on my talk page and I'll re-open it. Scottch 20:44, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Knight.jpg

Should be deleted and re-uploaded as Soldier.jpg, since that's the name of the Heartless.

• Delete as above. Scottch 06:28, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Closed

The result was delete. Scottch 16:05, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:KHII-Namine.jpg or Image:Namine FMV.jpg

The two pictures are copyrighted and depict the same subject with no real differences, so one of them has to go.

• Delete second - first matches the pics of other characters better and just looks nicer. Plus, it'll fit in an infobox better. Scottch 07:14, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete second Well I'm kinda biased here since I uploaded the pic, but it shows a much better view of Namine, and I think it fits better in the article. KeybladeWarriorNick 12:20 April 27 2007 (GMT-8)

Closed

The result was delete the second. Scottch 14:50, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Roxas.png or Image:Roxas ultimania.jpg

These fair use images depict the same subject and are far too similar to exist separately, unlike the additional image of Roxas in Twilight Town. One of them needs to go. Scottch 00:26, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

• Use second image - though I think it should be re-uploaded under the title of "Roxas.png" so the action can be reversible. The picture is nicer and shows him with his weapons, making it more consistent with the other Organization XIII pictures. Scottch 00:26, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Closed

The result was use second image. Scottch 21:07, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Rikku, Paine and Yuna

These are all the same article practically; most of the text is identical. Since the three are basically interchangeable and don't have unique roles, they should be merged to Gullwings.

• Merge as above. Scottch 21:06, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
• Merge, although the similarity of text might be a result of having the same author. -- SFH 21:08, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Closed

The result was merge to Gullwings. Scottch 18:56, 18 June 2007 (UTC)