KHWiki:Pages for deletion/Archives/2010 Apr

Dodge Roll LV %u24C1

Kindly delete this, as it is a product of a browser malfunction. --Neumannz 07:08, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

File:KeyBladeM.jpg

I made the picture myself using images from google. please let me know if this is not aloud. KeyBladeM 11:00, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

Old BBS Keyblade Images

With the new Ultimania Scans, these are no longer needed:

• File:Aqua Key.png
• File:Aqua's Keyblade form.jpg
• File:Chaos Reaper.jpg
• File:Chaos Reaper Closeup.png
• File:Dark Biter.jpg

--LegoAlchemist 21:56, April 4, 2010 (UTC)

Templete:SoraDragonCalibur

A "template" a user made for a second talk bubble by accident.--Lapis ofthe Night 19:39, April 7, 2010 (UTC)

Vanitas's Sentiment (Boss)

I don't get it Lingering Sentiment once had only one article that has a boss article later it had a character page? Why delete Vanitas's Sentiment (Boss)? --Cococrash11 21:47, April 9, 2010 (UTC)Cococrash11

The Lingering Sentiment only had the boss section of its article removed and made into its own article when the Lingering Sentiment page itself had enough content to stand alone. While the Vanitas's Sentiment has the character template on it, it should hardly be classified as such because it lacks an Appearance, Story, and Personality. Please DO NOT attempt to add this in, however. Leave the article be until it appears in a case similar to the Lingering Sentiment. - EternalNothingnessXIII 21:51, April 9, 2010 (UTC)

There's also the fact that the Lingering Sentiment, as of Kingdom Hearts Birth by Sleep, is not just a boss anymore ike Vanitas's Sentiment is. He is a temporary playable character with a role in the actual story.--Lapis ofthe Night 21:59, April 9, 2010 (UTC)

Can we please think of changing the infobox used on the page? - EternalNothingnessXIII 22:03, April 9, 2010 (UTC)

I think that we should there is no reason to keep it there it don't have any plot it is just a boss so unless he appears again in other game with a story it must keep only as a boss--Xabryn 23:50, April 9, 2010 (UTC)

First of all, there is no article called Vanitas's Sentiment (Boss). Second, Vanitas's Sentiment currently has no character role; it just serves as a boss. Because of this, the article Vanitas's Sentiment is used as if it were a boss article, though there is no need to add "(Boss)" to the end of the article's title since there is no respective character article for Vanitas's Sentiment. If Vanitas's Sentiment makes an appearance in a later game as a character, then an article covering its character will likely be created. --^DTN 23:57, April 9, 2010 (UTC)

Kingdom hearts:future worlds

Is there anything I have to say on this...? --LegoAlchemist 02:03, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

Kingdom Hearts Headquarters

The "Groudon-Fire" vandal again.--Lapis ofthe Night 21:53, April 13, 2010 (UTC)

Saix

Someone created a new Saix page. Mind deleting it? User:ZexionTheGamer/Signature

Too late! Made it a redirect instead. --Neumannz 01:41, April 14, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! User:ZexionTheGamer/Signature

Copycat

This should either be merged with Darkside or deleted, as it is not very useful or well written. Keyblade474 22:15, April 14, 2010 (UTC)

Template:Organization XIII Full

There's no reason for this; take it to the Fanon wiki, not here. Not that it's worth mentioning, but he didn't even bother to fix any of the information so it fits the table; For example, Ulquiorra's Attribute is "Left pectoral muscle", and Grimmjow's original name is "Shawlong Kūfang, Edrad Liones, Yylfordt Granz, Di Roy Linker and Nakeem Greendina". Maggosh 13:47, April 16, 2010 (UTC)

Card:Main page

This page as a deletion template but is not listed here. Do as you see fit. UnknownEnigma 16:44, April 20, 2010 (UTC)

Kingdom hearts 3

No explanation needed. Maggosh 01:03, April 21, 2010 (UTC)

Remakes and Other Titles

If'n you please. --Neumannz 20:24, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

Redirected to Kingdom Hearts, to fix the link in the side-bar. Thanks for the notice! --^DTN 22:07, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

What I think Kingdom hearts 3 the Keyblade wars would be like.

Fanon/speculation.--Lapis ofthe Night 01:06, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

Deleted --^DTN 01:42, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

Horizontal Slash

That page shouldn't be deleted. It is an actual Kingdom Hearts II ability that has not been explained on any other article. FinalMix+ 06:01, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

Same here this page needs to stay. SoraDragonCalibur

By right the Kingdom Hearts II abilities page or even Sora's ability page should explain it all ; this page would be nothing but a stub. If there are sufficient acquisition details PLUS an image PLUS the levels in which it is acquired, then yes, we can keep it. So, two options : make this page better or let it head straight to oblivion. TROISNYX AMDG 13:40, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

XionXIV

If you would be so kind. --Neumannz 20:34, April 26, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, it seriously needs to be deleted.--Kingdom zachdawg 21:09, April 26, 2010 (UTC)

Crown Stickers

This article is completely useless, as the only the fact we know is that they exist. Unless someone can get some real info, this article should cease its existence- entirely. The Inexistent 23:21, April 26, 2010 (UTC)The Inexistent

Wow, that's an overreaction. Given all the other stubs on this site, there's no reason not to leave it alone until we have more information. --Neumannz 23:36, April 26, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, that's why we have the "stub" category to begin with. We should always try and improve articles before deleting them, and the fact that we know the Crown Stickers will appear means we'll have more information eventually.--Lapis ofthe Night 23:42, April 26, 2010 (UTC)

I'm all for keeping it, as long as someone can add in more info on the Crown Stickers. TROISNYX AMDG 01:25, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

That's just the problem, Troisnyxetienne; there is no more information on "Crown Stickers". All we know is they are going to be in the North American version of Kingdom Hearts Birth by Sleep. We don't know if they are an in-game item, or a physical sticker that comes with the game. Until we get more information, we might as well keep it. --^DTN 03:15, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

True... I'm all for the keeping, even if in a worst-case scenario BBS gets released in August or early September. But I still think The Inexistent's remark was overdone. TROISNYX AMDG 03:47, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

Lock-On

I did this early cause I had a feeling it would show up. I took a lot of work into making that article. The reason why I did it is beacause I felt that this wiki is lacking the smaller details(like that Chaining article). FinalMix+ 07:00, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

Well, since it's a function and there are differences AND descriptions (including the one in the KH awakening), then I believe it should stay, but be expanded. And images must be added too. TROISNYX AMDG 07:05, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

With respect, may I have some opinions on this page as a replacement? It still lacks images, and I'm not sure about official descriptions, but I think it's mostly accurate, plus it incorporates related abilities. --Neumannz 07:08, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

Also, why the devil are you putting it here? Are you even nominating it for deletion? --Neumannz 07:09, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

Indeed ; I thought someone had actually put this bit up. TROISNYX AMDG 09:33, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

I think it should be kept because we can expand it to have more info. Anyone who has the exact definitions are welcome to put them up and I'm sure we have some images of enemies "locked on" to. It is an important function that is featured in every game (maybe except coded... I haven't played it so I have no idea) and it's also very important for the Shoot Lock ability in BBS which can be talked about. - HeartOfOblivion 14:44, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

M

Hey, an unregitered user created an article entitled "M". I, of course, can't delete it. The Inexistent 18:03, April 27, 2010 (UTC)The_Inexistent

Riku dark

Do I even need to explain it? Maggosh 13:48, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

It has been done. - HeartOfOblivion 17:08, April 29, 2010 (UTC)