53,710
edits
User talk:Soroxas: Difference between revisions
→"before you hit undo"
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) |
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 330: | Line 330: | ||
::::::Me not clicking undo is relevant because it means my original edit was done out of innocence/nescience, not spite. Context is important because it shows us our intentions. Considering that you spend so much time editing this wiki and effort dissecting everything I write on my talk page, I find it difficult to believe time is a premium for you, so much so that you couldn't even spare a few seconds to re-do some incorrect links. And if I see something I find to complain about, which you try to undermine as "grousing", I will. Editors have the right to make complaints, and yes, even *gasp* suggestions to policies. If editors weren't allowed to voice complaints about policies or behaviors of other editors (which I see myself doing the latter right now as opposed to the former), then this wiki would be an Orwellian authoritarian dictatorship which ignores basic free speech. When I'm informed of a policy I don't know of and it makes the neurons in my head understand what I need to do, then I follow it, but to say I'm not allowed to even express my thoughts on current policies in a disagreeing manner is ridiculous. [[User:Soroxas|Soroxas]] ([[User talk:Soroxas|talk]]) 14:51, 18 February 2019 (UTC) | ::::::Me not clicking undo is relevant because it means my original edit was done out of innocence/nescience, not spite. Context is important because it shows us our intentions. Considering that you spend so much time editing this wiki and effort dissecting everything I write on my talk page, I find it difficult to believe time is a premium for you, so much so that you couldn't even spare a few seconds to re-do some incorrect links. And if I see something I find to complain about, which you try to undermine as "grousing", I will. Editors have the right to make complaints, and yes, even *gasp* suggestions to policies. If editors weren't allowed to voice complaints about policies or behaviors of other editors (which I see myself doing the latter right now as opposed to the former), then this wiki would be an Orwellian authoritarian dictatorship which ignores basic free speech. When I'm informed of a policy I don't know of and it makes the neurons in my head understand what I need to do, then I follow it, but to say I'm not allowed to even express my thoughts on current policies in a disagreeing manner is ridiculous. [[User:Soroxas|Soroxas]] ([[User talk:Soroxas|talk]]) 14:51, 18 February 2019 (UTC) | ||
:"Me not clicking undo is relevant" - I didn't say it was done out of spite. I said it was wrong. | :"Me not clicking undo is relevant" - I didn't say it was done out of spite. I said it was wrong. (This misunderstanding of yours seems to be at the root of a lot of the issues you're involved in.) | ||
:"I find it difficult to believe time is a premium for you" -- this is also wrong. Getting an editor to understand and follow policy correctly saves much, much more time in the long run. | :"I find it difficult to believe time is a premium for you" -- this is also wrong. Getting an editor to understand and follow policy correctly saves much, much more time in the long run, and the only cases where the time is not worth it, is when the editor should just be blocked or banned altogether. | ||
:"I will." -- and in cases like this, your complaint would be inaccurate. I never said you weren't allowed to voice your thoughts. I said you were being ignorant.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 15:04, 18 February 2019 (UTC) | :"I will." -- and in cases like this, your complaint would be inaccurate. I never said you weren't allowed to voice your thoughts. I said you were being ignorant.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 15:04, 18 February 2019 (UTC) | ||