Forum:Heartless Design Revamp

From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Revision as of 02:49, 18 May 2010 by BebopKate (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{Forumheader|The World that Never was}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with either your talk page template or four tildes ~~~~ --> {{…')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search
KHWiki-Forum Logo.png
Forums: Index > The World that Never was > Heartless Design Revamp


Daisy-ChainofFakeries-1.png
BebopKate - This one is Zazzles...because he's Zazzy!
TALK - Here's your cat...and here's your $20...02:49, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
Alright, guys. Since we have quite a few volunteers for this project, I thought I'd just go ahead and pull it out of here and make a new topic for it. As a reminder of what we're doing ...

We need someone to go through and make sure every enemy article has a design section, which should cover the appearance of the enemy, and the etymology of its name. (DESIGN)


Daisy-ChainofFakeries-1.png
BebopKate - This one is Zazzles...because he's Zazzy!
TALK - Here's your cat...and here's your $20...02:49, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
I'm thinking, similar to other similar projects, we need to make a list of who's doing what. I have a couple of ideas of how we can divide this up to make it easier for everyone:

1. Enemies by World - There's going to be a bit of overlap here, since some critters appear in more than one area, but there are also quite a few unique to their areas, enough that dividing it this way is not going to confuse everyone greatly.

2. Enemies by Game - So far, that would be Kingdom Hearts, Kingdom Hearts Chain of Memories, et. al. My only concern is some people might feel a bit overwhelmed, unless a couple of us tackled each game at a time.

3. Enemies by Type - We have a few established Heartless-types, the black mage-esque ones being perhaps the most prominent. If someone wanted to snag all the Shadow-types, Soldier-types, etc, that could work.

4. A couple work on etymology, the others work on description - Just another idea to split the load.

So, my designing women friends, any input?