Talk:Rapunzel

That was clever, Kryten. You had me giggling. TRS NX 23:47, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

I think I know the reason, but I'm asking anyways: Why is this a disambiguation page? Nothing else in the series has been called "Rapunzel…" -

Eternal Nothingness XIII

02:34, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

As far as I can tell it was just Kryten being funny, then other people not quite grasping the breadth of the joke. Without the joke there is no reason for it to be a disambig.

I know I made an executive decision in scrapping the whole thing, but the only legit options are a redirect or nothing. We haven't even seen Rapunzel yet, and there has been no more than two or three off-hand mentions of her. So which shall it be, peeps? --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 03:30, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Scrap it.--Ninja Sheik 03:33, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Agreed. We really shouldn't be doing things here just to for the sake of "being funny." -

Eternal Nothingness XIII

03:49, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

It...wasn't supposed to be a joke, in any way. A redirect is a full violation of our policies, but we don't have enough info for an article and I didn't think we wanted to deal with constant deletions of this article. I figured a disambig would allow us to have a placeholder that still followed policies."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 16:47, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Can't we just not have anything? If we don't want to deal with an article being created with nothing on it, we can just protect the page until we actually have content. --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 17:24, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

that would meet policy too, i just figured we'd get tired of anons complaining about it.66.87.79.133 17:29, 19 August 2015 (UTC)