Forum:Who's staying, Who's going?

Forums: Index > The World that Never was > Who's staying, Who's going?

Chitalian8 ^Say...— Only by allowing strangers in can we find new ways to be ourselves.

_{Life's little crossroads are often as simple as the pull of a trigger. — 21:22, November 15, 2010 (UTC)}

So with the decision to move the existing wiki to another address, and to let the wiki here allow more fan-related material, there will inevitably be some users who are drawn to one location or the other. Some people may edit on one or the other, or possibly both. I suggest compiling a list of who's going to edit on the moved wiki, and who's going to stay here on the more fan-oriented one. If you would, please write your name/signature under one of the options.

Staying on the fan-oriented wiki

Going to the new address

Chitalian 8 21:22, November 15, 2010 (UTC)
LapisLazuliScarab21:30, November 15, 2010 (UTC)
Ag (Silver) - 47 107.8682 amu ~Crono 23:32, November 15, 2010 (UTC)
I could very well stay here to do some test coding and such (like the game that I'm trying to figure out), but the other one will be my home. KRCCFNF is tired of being STEPPED ON.
Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change , the courage to change the things I cannot accept, and the wisdom to hide the bodies of those I had to kill because they pissed me off. - Erry 07:40, November 16, 2010 (UTC)

Going to work on both

i'm not going to update this one or anything, just try my hardest at keeping the vandals at bay--ShadowsTwilight 21:23, November 15, 2010 (UTC)
Me too, I'll just try and keep the vandals away here. Expect me to be more active on the new site. The17 Master13:03, November 16, 2010 (UTC)

Discussion

I think I should jump in here to be clear that the wiki won't be moving, even if some of the editors here choose to fork the wiki and edit elsewhere. The wiki and all its content will still be here and open for editing. The idea of documenting more of the fan-based stuff sounds great, and I like the ideas that people have put forward about how to distinguish between the two types with templates or a different namespace. But it also needs to be acknowledged that the content that's been built here will still be here, and anything else should enhance that not replace it :) -- Sannse<staff /> (help forum | blog) 05:58, November 16, 2010 (UTC) (p.s. there are a few discussion pages now, so I wasn't sure where to add this - please move it if you prefer!

Uh, yeah. We know. What makes you think we ever thought differently? i think what he meant by "moved wiki" was "wiki we are moving to".--ShadowsTwilight

06:03, November 16, 2010 (UTC)

The Q Continuum weeps. Don't patronize us, we know what we're doing. mag gosh 06:05, November 16, 2010 (UTC)

It's a fair concern because traditionally when you say that something is "moving," that means it's being taken from one place and being put in another. In this case, it's more like something is being copied to somewhere else, at which point it will take on a life of its own, but the original is still there too to take on yet a different life. Agent0042 11:15, November 16, 2010 (UTC)

"But it also needs to be acknowledged that the content that's been built here will still be here," - That's not how a wiki works, sannse. The content on a wiki is at the discretion of that wiki's current community - if the current community wants to dump the content and put up their own content instead, that is perfectly within their rights. Claiming that the wikia wiki would need to keep some kind of memorial or shrine to the previous community is a bizarre misinterpretation of how community-based wiki's have worked, ever.(ಠ_ೃ) Bully! 14:55, November 16, 2010 (UTC)