Reversions
Why exactly do people keep reverting the edits about the shape of his keyblade? It seems intentional and notable to me, but maybe I'm missing something... Dazuro 01:51, October 19, 2009 (UTC)
- That would be because the shape of the keyblade is already explained in the article, no need to add it as trivia. --—YerMom is feeling jolly 02:23, October 19, 2009 (UTC)
But the article doesn't mention the Square-Enix connection. Dazuro 02:33, October 19, 2009 (UTC)
*sigh*... idiot...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guyviroth - "Falsebound to Existance, and yet I am here, standing before you." TALK - Do you not see that I am just a mere memory?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The picture i provided was not fanart... I have no idea how you came to the conclusion, but it is very astounding that you did... But, i will explain why it's not fanart.
Take my picture
Paste into MS paint.
Turn it 180 degrees.
Compare it to the picture of Master Eraqus in the last Vjump scan.
Oh look... they look extremely similar; a bit too similar to be mere fanart, right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- ...except that the hilt has never been shown uncovered, and the keychain is at the wrong angle. (180 degrees would have it pointing up, for starters. Just "touching it up" would count it as fanart - if it's not in an officially released image, it's not official.Glorious CHAOS! 05:04, October 28, 2009 (UTC)
Name"Master Keeper"