Talk:Sniperwild

Eternal Nothingness XIII - But why? Help me understand, Master Xehanort. What is it that I have failed to learn?
TALK - What? How did I— What did I do? What did YOU do? — 22:35, August 14, 2010 (UTC)

Do we have any evidence that its body is covered in fur? It could just as easily be skin or feathers, even though both are unlikely and fur is most plausible. However, I don't like seeing assumptions placed in the article. Is there a way we can revise it to state the same basic thing, but in a different and non-assumption-based manner?

Sniper Wilds are based on monkeys. Monkeys have fur. Therefore, Sniper Wilds can be very easily assumed to have fur. This is a rather generally made assumption. It is obvious that the Sniper Wild does not have feathers, skin is unlikely, and it can be concluded from its original species that its body is covered in fur, like a monkey. --^D T N

22:49, August 14, 2010 (UTC)

EDIT: Even in the images for the extremely closely related Powerwild and Bouncywild (all of their journal entries state they are derived from monkeys), you can see fur bunching up in places. Skin does not do this, and it is in fact very characteristic of fur. --^D T N

22:52, August 14, 2010 (UTC)