Talk:Kingdom Hearts III
Shouldn't this be a page? I though Nomura confirmed that KH3 is going to be developed but not in the near future. Erry ♓ 20:23, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- What would we put in the page? we know absolutely nothing about it--ShadowsTwilight 21:53, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Xbox One
source TheSilentHero (talk) 17:13, 11 June 2013 (UTC)I actually found out that source is wrong because at E3 it was revealed that sony got exclusive rights to kh3 so that source isn't to be trusted
Just look at the official Kingdom Hearts III site. They list Xbox One as platform. Sum2k3 (talk) 19:38, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
https://www.facebook.com/KingdomHearts/posts/10151422105455841
KINGDOM HEARTS III features a mature Sora as the main protagonist who sets forth on an adventure with Mickey, Donald and Goofy through new and legendary Disney worlds.
From the official KH facebook, enough to start covering on individual pages."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 00:27, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
|
More Details
|
Fun Note
|
|
This is what he means. Erry ♓ 20:42, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Trailer
How do we know that the "Pirate Ship" is actually a summon? It doesn't look much like a summon to me: when I first saw it I thought it was an area or world. TheFifteenthMember 12:30, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- There is a blue bar that decreases in the bottom left corner. Erry ♓ 12:38, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- If you look closely, you can tell they are still in Tram Common. I'm not sure I would call it a summon, though. That's like saying that ThunderBolt in Kingdom Hearts Birth by Sleep is a summon because it has a gauge, too. I would just leave it as a "command-style-like" attack, even state it as "summon-like attack", but not straight-out declare it as a summon. KeybladeSpyMaster 02:59, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- See, the issue with your argument is that it can be refuted as a command style just gives extra additions to normal combat and doesn't outright replace your commands with others as such with summons or summon-like systems. Plus in command styles, when you attack, the gauge increase, in the trailer, it does not. Erry ♓ 09:13, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Although I do agree with saying something like 'resembling a summon'. TheFifteenthMember 15:53, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- It's at least a summoned thing, if not a Summon."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 15:53, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Although I do agree with saying something like 'resembling a summon'. TheFifteenthMember 15:53, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
D23 Trailer information
|
Attraction Flow
|
Either way, I don't think such a tidbit is noteworthy on this article, but rather the complete Attraction Flow article that will inevitably be created.--Xion4ever 23:21, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Story restructuring per trailer
Okay, so we all know that trailers can't be used to inform the plot synopses. However, stuff like Xehanort appearing in LoD at an apparently younger age than he was at DI when his Heartless came to him leads us to at least some plot restructuring. I'm not sure if we've discussed this before, so I'm thinking:
- If our current plot synopses appear to contradict what the trailers seem to indicate, examine them to ensure that any assumptions they make are directly supported by the canon. For example, if KH3D doesn't say that Xehanort hadn't left his home before his Heartless came, then we shouldn't either.
- I feel like we should have some sort of Ansem's Computer sandbox for plot/topic write-ups that can't yet be posted to the mainspace due to their finalized canonicity being in flux. That way, people can add information about the stuff that's hyping them, but we're not getting into another 2.5-Taunt or Days-Wind Maker scenario.
Thoughts?"We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 20:29, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
- Definitely let's do a forum. Maybe even two, one in Ansem's Computer for write-ups, and a more free-form one (Twilight Town Library? World that Never Was?) for general notes and observations. --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 20:45, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
I'm fine with that, too. We're going to have to add the info sooner or later, so a rough draft/write-ups are a good idea. That anonymous user you messaged earlier today was restructuring the story with info from the trailer again on other articles, and I'm pretty sure others will attempt to do the same thing in the following days. I wish fans can understand that we want to add these info, too, but because of past experiences (BBS), we've learned our lesson about adding info based on trailers alone. We might need to resort on protecting pages, too. I don't think that'll happen, but just throwing that out there.--NinjaSheik 03:54, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- A site notice would be a good idea, too. Something like "As Kingdom Hearts III is still unreleased, it is not yet considered valid for inclusion in the main articles. Please add any suggested improvements based on the released promotional material to XXXX.""We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 13:50, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, that'd be good, but whether people choose to read and listen to that notice isn't guarantee. People outside the wiki think we're stuck-up idiots and/or being paranoid for doing stuff like this, so they just disregard us. That anonymous user, for example. Well, I'm all for it, anyway! :) If worst comes to shove, we can protect the pages.--NinjaSheik 20:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- A site notice would be a good idea, too. Something like "As Kingdom Hearts III is still unreleased, it is not yet considered valid for inclusion in the main articles. Please add any suggested improvements based on the released promotional material to XXXX.""We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 13:50, 17 June 2015 (UTC)