Talk:Kingdom Hearts HD 1.5 ReMIX

NAME CONFUSION

Neumannz — EVERYBODY OUT OF THE GODDAMN WAY. I GOT A LAB FULL OF HUMANS, A MOUTH FULL OF YELLING, AND A TORTURED PSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILE FULL OF TOTALLY HYSTERICAL EMOTIONS AND UNAIRED GRIEVANCES AT PRACTICALLY EVERYBODY. TALK — 02:00, 20 September 2012 (UTC)   NZ: Is it 1.5 or I.5? NZ: The logo font appears to show an "I" NZ: But the text on the official page uses a "1".

It's 1.5. The 1 just looks like an "I" to emphasize that it's an HD remake of the first Kingdom Hearts. Official website information, and press information all refer to it as "1.5", not "I.5". --Tektek (talk) 04:03, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Name Change

Just gotta say this, but the article's title is wrong. It should be the way it's written (and pronounced!): "Kingdom Hearts HD 1.5 ReMIX". --68.230.252.5 03:52, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Do this thing."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 04:23, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

I can't. T_T Doesn't look like I can move it. But YOU the admin should be able to! --Tektek (talk) 04:32, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

The official website and all press coverage refer to it as Kingdom Hearts 1.5 HD ReMIX, not Kingdom Hearts HD 1.5 ReMIX. The logo looks the way it does to appear balanced. --Knehcs (talk) 09:06, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

You're probably right, I've shouldn't have moved the page so fast, but is it with the hyphens/dashs or without? --ShardofTruth (talk) 09:47, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Can we get some links? The official page doesn't just have "HD 1.5" in the logo; scroll down the page... --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 13:17, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

....Guys? Guys. It's "HD 1.5 ReMIX", NOT "1.5 HD ReMIX." I don't see how you can possibly find the latter on the website and site sources....when it's clearly the former, you know, pretty much everywhere. This is confounding. --Tektek (talk) 16:09, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

One last little thing

3 I have absolutely no idea how to implement these on the pages, but here's a top icon. --Tektek (talk) 04:27, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Stop changing the freaking logo people =_=

Until an official transparent logo is out in the wild, stick with the one I uploaded. It's higher resolution than the one from the official website. Not to mention, it has a white background - compared to the site's that has a black. It causes a huge contrast with the ALL THE OTHER PAGES, and just generally looks like crap. Don't be difficult and senselessly stubborn. Just because it's from the official website doesn't make it the go-to-image, especially when there's a considerably better alternative. --Tektek (talk) 05:06, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Official trumps fanart. maggosh 13:43, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

...What. The. Shit. It's not fanart, you twat! It's the official logo from Famitsu! What is wrong with you? --Tektek (talk) 15:57, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

I think it's the official logo taken from the JP site, just the brightness of the Disney and SquareEnix lettering were reversed so they can be seen against the white background. --ShardofTruth (talk) 14:18, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Nothing's been reversed in this logo. NOTHING. It's the exact same palette as the one from the site. It just LOOKS that way because the background is white with this one - the logo looks darker, while the other looks lighter. Kingdom Hearts has never had a black/dark grey logo before, so it's a slightly jarring difference to the eyes. --Tektek (talk) 16:12, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Oh wow. Lol. Maggosh, you gorram hypocrite. ttp://www.khwiki.net/images/2/2c/Kingdom_Hearts_II_Final_Mix_Logo_KHIIFM.png I am not a moron - it's painfully easy to see that this logo is a photoshop, seeing as how pristine the logo itself is while the "Final Mix" is blurry because it has been up-ressed. Now, see, THAT, is "fanart." Yet you seem perfectly fine with that being up there. So, once again, unless Kryten says there is something truly evil and abominable about the one I uploaded, LEAVE IT ALOOOONE! --Tektek (talk) 16:07, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Three things: Don't insult other users, this will most likely get you a warning. You're old image is still there, please don't reupload another one and stick to the name convention next time and don't post comments all over a conversation, this is confusing. --ShardofTruth (talk) 16:29, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Apologies for the first. As to the second, no it wasn't - looks like Maggosh deleted it. When I tried going directly to the link, it just forwarded me to the image upload page. --Tektek (talk) 16:55, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

I did not delete it, you spoony bard. maggosh 17:40, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Well somebody did - right after you replaced it. So, insane troll logic dictates that it's all your fault. :< --Tektek (talk) 18:35, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

It wasn't deleted it was moved, and I uploaded an originally transparent image. Erry 20:41, 20 September 2012 (UTC)