User talk:Knoname
The ultimate battle for KINGDOM HEARTS is upon us.
| |
We hope you enjoy your time on the Kingdom Hearts Wiki! Before you contribute, please see the following:
Thank you for joining the Kingdom Hearts Wiki community! We look forward to working with you. May your heart be your guiding key! — UxieLover1994 06:29, 6 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
New pages
Please don't create new pages when you have no content to put in them, especially if you're not going to add stub or maintenance templates. --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 22:10, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Remember to sign your posts with four ~~~~. --TheFifteenthMember 23:10, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
- Despite these little difficulties we all appreciate the work you're doing here. --ShardofTruth 23:34, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Link sections
Please stop adding those. As I've said before, they are meant to go in the infobox.192.249.47.177 16:28, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- I do not imagine it is in likeliness that everyone that views this wiki wishes to wait for information. What I added to Dream Eaters were Link Attacks/Styles. If you wish to erase them to overwrite with your form, that is fine. However, I was not going to wait to add information that I knew. My mindset was, "At least it is there for others to view". I understand you wish to make it more presentable, as could many pages. Yet, I only added to any said pages what I knew. Now, with that said I am finished adding Link Attacks/Styles. If you wish to overwrite at your leisure, you can. I only wished for the information to be available to others at this early stage of the game's english releases.Knoname (talk) 14:22, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Ability Link, etc.
Please see Dark Splicer for an example of the correct format for listing where commands can be obtained."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 18:01, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
- I am not understanding your remark or what you mean specifically by "correct format". If what I have provided is not to your liking, you may edit them with the "correct format".
- Commands found in a chest should use the format:
- *Riku can find Dark Splicer in a chest at the [[Delusive Beginning]].
- Commands obtained through ability link should use the format:
- *The [[Keeba Tiger]] has Dark Splicer in its Ability Link.
- You are the one adding most of these to the pages, and it is your responsibility to use the consensus format. Please revise the pages you have already edited with the correct format."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 18:41, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
- Not that I am not willing to adjust the changes, but questions. Primarily, if this was an issue, why is it being addressed at the current. Surely, most whole-heartedly at its truth, you are not the sole person of whom has been keeping watch over any of the pages that I have edited. In continuation, you and other administrators should all be aware. If the other administrators have not said a thing, it comes to two things at hand. First, they do not heavily enforce the policy of which you have presented toward me, in which case there is a conflict of basis between you, an administrator, and others administrators and moderators. Secondly, they are not or were not at the time fully aware of the policy of your "consensus format" when I had added the information that I knew, in this specific case pertaining to what are called "Deck Command" in Kingdom Hearts 3D: Dream Drop Distance. Now, I sincerely and truly with my right hand, and in absolutely no facetious way, would gladly change what I have added to fit the correct form. However, I am serious when I say I cannot appreciate you saying, foremost, it is my "responsiblity to use consensus format" when I have seen differentiations between "formats" used by other individuals. For you to say it is my "responsibility" is not registering with me as to the consistency I have seen elsewhere on this wiki. I am sure that you would have asked others to make their changes, yet there is not uniformity with format. In addition, I do not believe you are wholly justified when you say it is my responsibility as this is a wiki where others, of whom I would assume also would have made alterations to what I have added to follow suit with the formal format if aware of it, would make modifications.
- Now, as I've said and will reiterate, I would not at all mind changing what I have added, but I find it to be a problem telling me it is my responsibility. If anything, I would assume it would be the responsibility of those whom have higher standings and "power" to adjust what they feel is not right.
- Yet, why tell me that what I have added is wrong now. I aware of other moderators and administrators, like yourself, However, in the past week approxiamtely from this day and time, why have not others likewise with your standing not brought this to my attention but yet a week later? I know with a truthful heart other administrators and moderator have viewed the pages I have edited. Yet, why do you insist it is my responsibility and after this time frame?
- My concern, and the stem of this comment, is the inconsistency of something seemingly small, whether it truly is or not, be not addressed by other of your likeliness. If anything I wish from this is for someone to make a remark in advance and not tell me what you have told me, the way you have told. Knoname (talk) 22:28, 7 August 2012 (UTC)