Talk:Storm Rider
Error
The Storm Rider Heatless is a pureblood, but it has an emblem, somthing to put in the trivia section maybe? Myself 123 18:20, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
"...it was turned into a Heartless." key word being "it was turned", as in "someone[thing] turned it into a heartless". It doesn't look like a pureblood to me either, seeing as it isn't mostly black like the other purebloods. Where does it say that it is a pureblood? 190.232.81.113 05:00, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Like you said a pureblood heartless is something that turns into a heartless, a emblem heartless is a artificial heartless made by a machine, a storm rider was a dragon meaning it's pureblood. Myself 123 21:19, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
If it has an emblem, It's an emblem Heartless, durr. Guardian Soul 21:29, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- A pureblood is a heartless made out of pure darkness. A emblem heartless is made artifically, like Xigbar corrupting a dragon, not neccesarily requiring machines. XienZo 21:44, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
- No it's not, pureblood heartless are are made when somthing loses it's heart to darkness, emblem heartless are artificaly made and don't require a living thing. Check this wiki's heartless page if you don't belive me. Myself 123 23:33, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- That's not correct, you need to do more research. All heartless require a living thing. Guardian Soul 04:58, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
I don't recall hearing that anywhere, all information i've gathered states that emblem heartless are made artificially using a device that recreates the codition that spawns heartless naturly. Myself 123 21:42, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
I think the solution here is pretty obvious. Chinese dragons are typically portrayed as wise and good, or in Kingdom Hearts terms, lacking darkness in their hearts. Now if Xigbar had just plain turned it, the dragon would have likely turned into a shadow, possibly a neoshadow. So isn't likely that he used some sort of machine, which Xemnas could have easily built mind you, to facilitate a greater change then normal? 69.250.217.58 16:03, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
