Talk:Attractions

Seriously Byz, don't. This will need its own page in due course, and there's no point making a redirect for it now. TRSNX 15:03, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

A redirect is fine for now and besides someone else has made a redirect for Rapunzel so i don't see how this is any different. Byzantinefire - There are no strings on me (talk) 15:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

I don't know why this had to be done in the first place for Rapunzel; we never did this for when Jaq was announced for Birth by Sleep. The page was erased immediately. TRSNX 15:58, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Rapunzel was probably made into a redirect (temporarily) because we have no information about her involvement in Kingdom Hearts. Attraction Flow is something we actually could make an article out of at the present time. - Eternal Nothingness XIII 17:30, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

I have to disagree. We know too little about Attraction Flow at this moment to make it into an article. I think we should delete this redirect, and Rapunzel as well, for now. TheSilentHero 17:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

I wouldn't be against making some sort of preliminary article for Attraction Flow. We've already seen at least 3 or 4 different uses of the technique, and we know what it is at a basic level. If not an actual article, at least some sort of preliminary design should be whipped up. Chitalian8 17:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

If we have enough to cobble together an article, then let's go for it. I think we do anyway, not sure about what the rest think. Otherwise, delete altogether. TRSNX 20:07, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

We certainly have more about Attraction Flow to make a rough article than we do the so-called "Kingdom of Corona." - Eternal Nothingness XIII 21:00, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Yes, this article contains so much more content than Kingdom of Corona. But seriously, I think it would be a better idea to create articles about new KH3 features in userspace first, and move it to mainspace when it has enough information, like how a lot of other wiki's do it. TheSilentHero 11:29, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

This article can be good enough to continue existing if we add a development section with the information we've learned from previous interviews. I'm not against moving it to a user space if no one wants to add that section at the moment. --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 11:57, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Well i just noticed the french Kingdom Hearts wiki has this page. Byzantinefire - There are no strings on me (talk) 16:22, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

That has exactly no bearing on what we do here. --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 17:18, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Well they don't seem to have any problem with having the page on there wiki. Byzantinefire - There are no strings on me (talk) 17:27, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Still no bearing. Whether we have a page or not is up to us. --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 18:02, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

I honestly don't understand why we have ANY Kingdom Hearts III articles on this Wiki aside from the actual game's page. There is almost no information on the game's content right now; we are merely placing things because we saw them in trailers, which we've said time and again are NOT a valid source for information. - Eternal Nothingness XIII 18:21, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Right, what should be on here is the information from the interviews, which is confirmed information that we have. --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 20:58, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

The only reason I created the Kingdom of Corona page was because back when La Cite des Cloches was revealed for KH3D, a page was made for it immediately. I figured that it wasn't going against any policies. If we decide to keep the page, should it be locked until the game's release? Chainoffire 06:57, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

I am absolutely not okay with having a table here. That crosses the line into assuming (1) that material only shown in trailers and not confirmed in interviews is set in stone, which is wildly inaccurate, and (2) that we clearly understand the mechanics of what we're seeing in the trailer, which is wildly-er inaccurate."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 13:17, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Well i guess this is fine and i only added the table to make the article more full. Byzantinefire - There are no strings on me (talk) 16:17, 20 August 2015 (UTC)