|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Inexistent - Pitiful users, mindlessly collecting information. The rage of an edit releases this knowledge, and they all come together, to form: The Wiki!!!
TALK - And on the Wiki these words appear: "My name is The_Inexistent, user of users: Look upon my edits, ye Mighty, and despair!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Okay, as seen here and here, we have discussed a "featured user". I, for one, am all for this, but I don't know about the rest of you. If it were to work like most of you are thinking, the staff would do the choosing. But, as Lego pointed out on the staff re- org page, this could easily turn into a popularity contest, thus causing arguments, so, I created this template as an alternate option. Of course, the template would have to expanded, maybe including a slight description and edit count. Any thoughts as to which is better? Any other ideas?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, that's a bit harsh. Deleting the user? ^_- Seriously, does this need a deletion? BebopKate 23:46, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
