1,159
edits
Line 2,094: | Line 2,094: | ||
I understand that. What sort of jumps at me is that....blanking out looks to be the "go-to solution", rather than citing, or at least looking for a source. I mean....it kinda does a disservice to the whole point of this being a wiki, right? --[[User:Ignis|Ignis]] ([[User talk:Ignis|talk]]) 22:09, 6 July 2016 (UTC) | I understand that. What sort of jumps at me is that....blanking out looks to be the "go-to solution", rather than citing, or at least looking for a source. I mean....it kinda does a disservice to the whole point of this being a wiki, right? --[[User:Ignis|Ignis]] ([[User talk:Ignis|talk]]) 22:09, 6 July 2016 (UTC) | ||
:Well of course I don't want you guys turning into....well, Gawker! Correct information definitely beats the latest scoops! But what I'm saying is....if it's blanked out, then look for ''verifiable, legit reasons to un-blank it''. Interviews, videos, whatever. The longer something is blanked out, the more reason to look for those sources instead of ignoring it. --[[User:Ignis|Ignis]] ([[User talk:Ignis|talk]]) 05:26, 7 July 2016 (UTC) |
edits