Forum:Teeny suggestion for 2.8: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with either your talk page template or four tildes ~~~~ --> | <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with either your talk page template or four tildes ~~~~ --> | ||
This won't really become relevant until it, well, does, but it was regardless a tiny idea I had. When 2.8 is out (or before it even), we'll have to get around to creating the inevitable separate game entry pages for Back Cover and 0.2. Which is perfectly fine, except they're not ''really'' coming out like previous games did. They're original, brand new entries that are regardless part of an exclusive compilation. Hence when they go up, I think we should do two important tweaks to indicate: Add ''some'' kind of indicator to their front page icons that those games are a part of 2.8 - something like a tiny dream eater symbol on a bottom corner, or something. And second, slightly tweak the color of the infoboxes. I already played around with that a bit - just hit the sandbox to get an idea. And keep in mind, this is '''ONLY''' for Back Cover and 0.2 BBS. Now, there's still plenty of time until ''actual'' news starts trickling down - when we actually have to make entries for them. But until | This won't really become relevant until it, well, does, but it was regardless a tiny idea I had. When 2.8 is out (or before it even), we'll have to get around to creating the inevitable separate game entry pages for Back Cover and 0.2. Which is perfectly fine, except they're not ''really'' coming out like previous games did. They're original, brand new entries that are regardless part of an exclusive compilation. Hence when they go up, I think we should do two important tweaks to indicate: Add ''some'' kind of indicator to their front page icons that those games are a part of 2.8 - something like a tiny dream eater symbol on a bottom corner, or something. And second, slightly tweak the color of the infoboxes. I already played around with that a bit - just hit the sandbox to get an idea. And keep in mind, this is '''ONLY''' for Back Cover and 0.2 BBS. Now, there's still plenty of time until ''actual'' news starts trickling down - when we actually have to make entries for them. But until then, why not discuss? --[[User:Webber22|Webber22]] ([[User talk:Webber22|talk]]) 04:02, 15 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:04, 15 May 2016
This won't really become relevant until it, well, does, but it was regardless a tiny idea I had. When 2.8 is out (or before it even), we'll have to get around to creating the inevitable separate game entry pages for Back Cover and 0.2. Which is perfectly fine, except they're not really coming out like previous games did. They're original, brand new entries that are regardless part of an exclusive compilation. Hence when they go up, I think we should do two important tweaks to indicate: Add some kind of indicator to their front page icons that those games are a part of 2.8 - something like a tiny dream eater symbol on a bottom corner, or something. And second, slightly tweak the color of the infoboxes. I already played around with that a bit - just hit the sandbox to get an idea. And keep in mind, this is ONLY for Back Cover and 0.2 BBS. Now, there's still plenty of time until actual news starts trickling down - when we actually have to make entries for them. But until then, why not discuss? --Webber22 (talk) 04:02, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
