7,970
edits
Talk:Dream Eater: Difference between revisions
→Etymology sections
Chitalian8 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 231: | Line 231: | ||
I forget if there was a reasoning behind this, but Dream Eaters are the only enemy pages that have a distinct subsection for their Etymology in the Design section. Is having the subsection correct, or should the Dream Eater articles be corrected/adjusted? I understand the formatting weirdness caused by having the Spirit and Nightmare sections. {{User:Chitalian8/Sig}} 14:24, 23 August 2015 (UTC) | I forget if there was a reasoning behind this, but Dream Eaters are the only enemy pages that have a distinct subsection for their Etymology in the Design section. Is having the subsection correct, or should the Dream Eater articles be corrected/adjusted? I understand the formatting weirdness caused by having the Spirit and Nightmare sections. {{User:Chitalian8/Sig}} 14:24, 23 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
:I think it was because of the Spirit/Nightmare subsections. But now that you bring it up, I think it will be a good idea to give the Etymology a subsection on all enemy pages. Even the Battle section has subsections for Attacks and Strategy, so why not the Design section? {{User:TheSilentHero/Sig}} 16:11, 23 August 2015 (UTC) | :I think it was because of the Spirit/Nightmare subsections. But now that you bring it up, I think it will be a good idea to give the Etymology a subsection on all enemy pages. Even the Battle section has subsections for Attacks and Strategy, so why not the Design section? {{User:TheSilentHero/Sig}} 16:11, 23 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
::I think it was like that before, but the etymology sections were only like 1 or 2 sentences anyway, so it's a little silly to designate a whole section for them, as opposed to just having a paragraph. {{User:Chitalian8/Sig}} 19:16, 23 August 2015 (UTC) | |||