Talk:Attractions: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
This article ''can'' be good enough to continue existing if we add a development section with the information we've learned from previous interviews. I'm not against moving it to a user space if no one wants to add that section at the moment. --{{User:Neumannz/SigTemplate}} 11:57, 19 August 2015 (UTC) | This article ''can'' be good enough to continue existing if we add a development section with the information we've learned from previous interviews. I'm not against moving it to a user space if no one wants to add that section at the moment. --{{User:Neumannz/SigTemplate}} 11:57, 19 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
:Well i just noticed the french Kingdom Hearts wiki has this page. {{User:Byzantinefire/Sig}} 16:22, 19 August 2015 (UTC) | :Well i just noticed the french Kingdom Hearts wiki has this page. {{User:Byzantinefire/Sig}} 16:22, 19 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
::That has exactly no bearing on what we do here. --{{User:Neumannz/SigTemplate}} 17:18, 19 August 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:18, 19 August 2015
Seriously Byz, don't. This will need its own page in due course, and there's no point making a redirect for it now. TRSNX 15:03, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- A redirect is fine for now and besides someone else has made a redirect for Rapunzel so i don't see how this is any different. Byzantinefire - There are no strings on me (talk) 15:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
I don't know why this had to be done in the first place for Rapunzel; we never did this for when Jaq was announced for Birth by Sleep. The page was erased immediately. TRSNX 15:58, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Rapunzel was probably made into a redirect (temporarily) because we have no information about her involvement in Kingdom Hearts. Attraction Flow is something we actually could make an article out of at the present time. - Eternal Nothingness XIII 17:30, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
I wouldn't be against making some sort of preliminary article for Attraction Flow. We've already seen at least 3 or 4 different uses of the technique, and we know what it is at a basic level. If not an actual article, at least some sort of preliminary design should be whipped up. Chitalian8 17:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- If we have enough to cobble together an article, then let's go for it. I think we do anyway, not sure about what the rest think. Otherwise, delete altogether. TRSNX 20:07, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- We certainly have more about Attraction Flow to make a rough article than we do the so-called "Kingdom of Corona." - Eternal Nothingness XIII 21:00, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, this article contains so much more content than Kingdom of Corona. But seriously, I think it would be a better idea to create articles about new KH3 features in userspace first, and move it to mainspace when it has enough information, like how a lot of other wiki's do it. TheSilentHero 11:29, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- We certainly have more about Attraction Flow to make a rough article than we do the so-called "Kingdom of Corona." - Eternal Nothingness XIII 21:00, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
This article can be good enough to continue existing if we add a development section with the information we've learned from previous interviews. I'm not against moving it to a user space if no one wants to add that section at the moment. --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 11:57, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- Well i just noticed the french Kingdom Hearts wiki has this page. Byzantinefire - There are no strings on me (talk) 16:22, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
- That has exactly no bearing on what we do here. --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 17:18, 19 August 2015 (UTC)