Forum:Art Transparency

Forums: Index > The World that Never was > Art Transparency

TheFifteenthMember Yes. You're creepy. I can't say we'll miss you while you're gone, so it'd be best if you did go. We all win that way. — TheFifteenthMember 21:05, 13 June 2014 (UTC) I don't know much about images but I've noticed that many concept art images have been made transparent. I want to know whether that's correct, though. I thought the white background was intentional to represent paper for any shading the artist may have used. Thoughts?

KeybladeSpyMaster - I do it for my family, my home, my friends! I do it for her! TALK - Welcome to Spy Force One. - 02:15 PM Fri, June 13, 2014 MST YOU'RE WRONG! GOSH, FM! Ok, now that my sarcastic, non-existent anger is taken care of (this is what happens when I don't see my friends for too long), here's how I understand it. Byzantinefire has been uploading several bigger images to the wiki. To center his efforts, Xion4ever directed him to the list of images on the Project update Forum, and he's been working on that. There was a little problem with it after a day (yesterday), because some of the images he was uploading were of lower quality, and others were edited rather badly. But it was supposed to have been taken care of. That's all I know.

TheFifteenthMember I like white. I find it goes well with yellow, but only if you want it to. — TheFifteenthMember 21:22, 13 June 2014 (UTC) So concept art is supposed to be transparent? That's what I need clarified here.

KeybladeSpyMaster - I do it for my family, my home, my friends! I do it for her! TALK - Welcome to Spy Force One. - 02:28 PM Fri, June 13, 2014 MST I think so. See, I just go with what Xion4ever says as far as images go. She pointed Byz to the forum, where I assume (though I haven't had time to check all of them) the images Byz has been uploading are listed. Several of the images he uploaded were there when I checked yesterday, so I assume the concept art is on that list. The only image I fought against becoming transparent (and it's not on the list) is Smile (Art), because it's an artwork that, like you said, has a shadow and such. But it wasn't on that list in the first place. Let me check the list for the images Byz has uploaded, and I'll get back on whether the images should be made transparent, but as far as I know those concept art images should be transparent. EDIT: I would just check against that list. The images Byz has uploaded as transparent are on that list, but not all concept art images are on that list. I don't know if that answers your concerns enough. That's just how I see it from my point: a bystander on a massive project.

TheFifteenthMember Ignoring how these caterpillars uttered what they're trying to say, I do agree. — TheFifteenthMember 22:03, 13 June 2014 (UTC) Sounds like we need to establish which art should be transparent and which art should be left white (or have someone knowledgeable explain it to us *cough*Xion*cough).

KeybladeSpyMaster - I do it for my family, my home, my friends! I do it for her! TALK - Welcome to Spy Force One. - 04:46 PM Fri, June 13, 2014 MST Yeah, but we'd have to wait for a while. Xion is out for a couple of days.

Xion is out for a couple of days. Ha ha. Making in-game references to all the times Xion was asleep?</day193> Aha..ha..I blame the late night driving. >_< First, I really really don't see the need to go through every. single. image. and resize them. Why? Truth we told, you're taking a already high quality image and making it bigger...So what? We use images throughout the Wiki, yes, but ninety percent of them are resized using [[File:Image.png|200px]]. I'd rather see some activity on the numerous other projects and articles that need work. I think I would sell a kidney for the 3D Moogle Shop table... As per your question... I've always considered character artworks (such as File:Young Sora (Art) KH.png) and weapons (File:Soul Eater (Art).png and File:Stirring Ladle (Art).png) to be okay. Images I think should be left alone: artwork images such as File:Smile (Art).png, and most concept artwork (File:Sora (D23 Expo Japan 2013) Sketch.png). What was never as clear to me is the concept artwork. Compare File:Axe Flapper (Art).png with File:Sora (Concept) 2 (Art).png. Axe Flapper, at least to me, looks fine being transparent. Sora's concept artwork two? Not so much. It doesn't look hideous, but I don't know if being transparent is the way to go. Xion4ever Promise... — 04:52, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Byzantinefire - "I am king under the Mountain" TALK - :) Byzantinefire (talk) 04:57, 14 June 2014 (UTC) Large images are good many users upload larger and higher quality versions of all the time like JMAS and i was doing the image renovation to make it up to the KHWiki and its not easy adding many images to 3 wiki's at once.

KeybladeSpyMaster - I do it for my family, my home, my friends! I do it for her! TALK - Welcome to Spy Force One. - 10:35 AM Sat, June 14, 2014 MST Xion is right, though, the images aren't necessary. She didn't say stop doing it, but she highlighted the lack of need for it. I like them, personally (secretly, they help me in my endeavours to play around with the logos on Photoshop). Still, that doesn't mean the wiki needs them. And Byz, you don't have to upload them to three wikis. This one is fine, if you really want to, I guess the DisneyWiki. But three? Might be a bit too much. You seem to admit yourself that you'd rather not do it. So don't feel like you have to, unless you want to. Regarding the issue of this forum, the transparency, I feel it looks great on most of the art. As Xion noted, though, there are some concept artwork that could probably do better without transparency. It seems to be on a case-by-case basis. However, the images Byz has uploaded are all on the list Xion posted, so I feel that at least those seem right.

Byzantinefire - "I am king under the Mountain" TALK - :) {{{time}}} But it gives me an excuse to make the images my own.

Eternal Nothingness XIII - I'm not afraid of what the darkness holds now. Even if you do wrest control of my heart from me, even if you cast me into the deepest, darkest abyss, you'll never sway me from the one cause that pushes me to keep on fighting. Whatever the cost, I'm ready to pay it. TALK - There's darkness within me... So what does that matter? I know I'm strong enough to hold it back. — 18:28, 14 June 2014 (UTC) But these images are not yours. I personally feel like taking all this artwork and making it transparent detracts from the "officialism" and original glory of the pieces in question. Making renders and sprites transparent is one thing. Doing it to artwork, however? I don't find it at all necessary. I guess it's because when one makes a render or something extracted from a game transparent for use on the Wiki, that's one thing, because the game is pretty much available to everyone; anyone can take a render of Donald Duck out of Kingdom Hearts II and pose it to create their own render. But a piece of artwork belongs to someone. What you're doing here, to me, is equivalent to taking Vincent Van Gogh's Starry Night and removing the background so you can only and more clearly see the stars and landscape he painted. Maybe the Keyhole and Disney Wiki want the Kingdom Hearts artwork transparent, but I personally find our images to be fine. I see nothing wrong with leaving the artwork the way it is, since that's how it was released to the world: in its original, non-transparent form.

Byzantinefire - "I am king under the Mountain" TALK - :) {{{time}}} Well i'm not making the Smile artwork transparent right now or in the future i have been focusing on other images.

I'm not sure if we all learned this through our adventures in formal schooling, real life, and/or Wiki editing, but just because you edit an image [resize, remove a watermark, flip, make transparent, etc.] does not mean you own it. This is why proper licensing and asking for permission are so critically important. Just a reminder. It seems to me that some of us agree with artwork transparency. What we haven't determined is what artwork qualifies...Meaning we're back at square one. It's apparent that ENX is strictly against any form of artwork transparency. I'm still not quite sure what to make of this. I'm no image expert by any means, but I fail to see how having some artwork such as or File:Rikku (Concept) (Art).png destroys or defaces the artwork. All images, sprites, artworks- anything and everything in the game and/or released in promotion/for the game- belongs to someone. Also, most images, even renders released from official sources, come with a white background. Not sure why, some just do. We aren't making images transparent to deliberately destroy or focus on a specific part; most transparencies are done because the excess white backgrounds are unnecessary and/or distracting. Take the images I've previously listed. I fail to see how "deeply"/darkly/clearly outlined artworks, such as Aladdin and Rikku are negatively affected by transparency. The images are either completely colored in or are so well defined in "pencil" that the "cookie-cutter" style of removing the excess white background is not harmful. Now for "lighter" colored/shaded images such as File:Sora (Early Concept) 3 (Art).png, I think having a white background is helpful so you can clearly see the image. I think we would be better off using a case by case situation. Xion4ever Who am I? — 05:10, 15 June 2014 (UTC)