User talk:24.254.139.24: Difference between revisions

From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
(→‎Reverts: new section)
Line 2: Line 2:


{{NinjaSheik|text=Judging from your Contributions, this isn't your first time doing this and you've been blocked before. I advise you to watch your attitude. While I understand that you merely trying to edit, that does not excuse the fact that you acted quite rude instead of speaking nicely about the edit to the other editor. For now, I'll leave you with a warning.}}
{{NinjaSheik|text=Judging from your Contributions, this isn't your first time doing this and you've been blocked before. I advise you to watch your attitude. While I understand that you merely trying to edit, that does not excuse the fact that you acted quite rude instead of speaking nicely about the edit to the other editor. For now, I'll leave you with a warning.}}
== Reverts ==
Regarding the reverts to the X-blade:
*The Game template specifically says in its instructions that it is only to be used when a source is provided that the subject appears in that game. You are expected to actually read the documentation for a template to understand what it is for before using it.
*Other Keyblades or items that do not have an infobox still do not use the thumb parameter.
So that explains why the edit was in error.
As for reaching out to him: yes, he should be explaining why he reverted the edit, unless he's had to do it several times already. However, as covered in the editing guidelines, if another editor reverts your edit, ''especially'' if that editor is a veteran who you can safely assume is more familiar with the wiki style and policies, you're supposed to take it to the article or user talk pages for a discussion rather than simply reverting their edit. Reverting an edit ''once'', especially when it is done according to wiki guidelines, despite failing to provide an reversion reason ''is not instigating the edit war''. The edit war is instigated when one of the editors chooses to ignore the wiki style on how the page should be formatted, and ignore the editing guidelines on what to do in case of a disagreement, and chooses instead to respond by reverting the edit and even worse, doing so with vitriol.
I'll ask maggosh to be more forthcoming in his reversion reasons, but you also need to be more honest about your own actions, and please quit it with acting like your own personal vendetta with him is representative of the fandom at large.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 18:49, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:49, 11 August 2013

I'm not laughing!
Roxas B 7★ KHUX.png
This is a warning for for uncivil conduct and personal attacks on a user.

Your edits have been reverted; please do not attempt to repeat them.
If you wish to do test edits, you are welcome to do so here.

— --NinjaSheik 17:49, 3 August 2013 (UTC)


Naminé (Live talk sprite) 1 KHCOM.gif
NinjaSheik - All of this might have started with a lie...But I'm really am glad that I could meet you...
TALK - One day, the light-it will be ours, and it will bring us together. Til then, I'll be in your heart...
Judging from your Contributions, this isn't your first time doing this and you've been blocked before. I advise you to watch your attitude. While I understand that you merely trying to edit, that does not excuse the fact that you acted quite rude instead of speaking nicely about the edit to the other editor. For now, I'll leave you with a warning.

Reverts

Regarding the reverts to the X-blade:

  • The Game template specifically says in its instructions that it is only to be used when a source is provided that the subject appears in that game. You are expected to actually read the documentation for a template to understand what it is for before using it.
  • Other Keyblades or items that do not have an infobox still do not use the thumb parameter.

So that explains why the edit was in error.

As for reaching out to him: yes, he should be explaining why he reverted the edit, unless he's had to do it several times already. However, as covered in the editing guidelines, if another editor reverts your edit, especially if that editor is a veteran who you can safely assume is more familiar with the wiki style and policies, you're supposed to take it to the article or user talk pages for a discussion rather than simply reverting their edit. Reverting an edit once, especially when it is done according to wiki guidelines, despite failing to provide an reversion reason is not instigating the edit war. The edit war is instigated when one of the editors chooses to ignore the wiki style on how the page should be formatted, and ignore the editing guidelines on what to do in case of a disagreement, and chooses instead to respond by reverting the edit and even worse, doing so with vitriol.

I'll ask maggosh to be more forthcoming in his reversion reasons, but you also need to be more honest about your own actions, and please quit it with acting like your own personal vendetta with him is representative of the fandom at large."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 18:49, 11 August 2013 (UTC)