Game talk:Sark: Difference between revisions
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
::::Mkay. Suggest it on the Enemy template talk so we can implement it, and away we go!{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 03:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC) | ::::Mkay. Suggest it on the Enemy template talk so we can implement it, and away we go!{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 03:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
::Okay, then instead of having No Heart as "Data" perhaps it would be better to have bosses like No Heart/Armor of the Master, Anti-Riku/Anti-Saix, Vivi, the Organization Data battles, etc., to be categorized as "Simulations" instead, to differentiate them a bit better from other digital guys like Data-Riku and Sark?[[Special:Contributions/70.71.109.113|70.71.109.113]] 04:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC) | ::Okay, then instead of having No Heart as "Data" perhaps it would be better to have bosses like No Heart/Armor of the Master, Anti-Riku/Anti-Saix, Vivi, the Organization Data battles, etc., to be categorized as "Simulations" instead, to differentiate them a bit better from other digital guys like Data-Riku and Sark?[[Special:Contributions/70.71.109.113|70.71.109.113]] 04:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
:::Sounds good to me. [[User:Maggosh|mag]][[User talk:Maggosh|gosh]] 04:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:15, 25 February 2012
Easily Defeated? Well, while it is true that Sark is easy to kill, I don't think is should mention how easy it is to beat him Because it seems a bit opinionated. PLus, it may be insulting to those who did find Sark difficult. Not that anybody does I am sure.(Bananaphone1996 21:34, June 4, 2010 (UTC)) (Bananaphone1996 07:37, June 3, 2010 (UTC))
Title
Why is the Character page called Sark, while the Boss page is called Commander Sark and the journal refers to him as Sark. 
Organization13 
12:02, June 20, 2010 (UTC)
Hello? Organization13 11:56, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
Anyone? Organization13 13:01, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
If the Journal just calls him Sark, the page should just be "Sark (Boss)".LapisLazuliScarab21:11, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
So, shouldn't the name be changed? Organization13 18:19, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
Why is he considered a "somebody"?
My complaints about the term "somebody" in general aside, shouldn't Sark be considered a "Data" character? 70.71.109.113 23:01, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
- Though he may be made of data, he is a complete being- which is what technically constitutes a Somebody. And yes, I do think we need to change the term. --
AS IF! 23:13, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
- Weren't we going to change it to "Other" or something?"We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 02:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
- I've always been a fan of "Entelechy". Compared to the other options that have been suggested, I feel like it would work best. -- AS IF! 02:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
- Mkay. Suggest it on the Enemy template talk so we can implement it, and away we go!"We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 03:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
- I've always been a fan of "Entelechy". Compared to the other options that have been suggested, I feel like it would work best. --
- Okay, then instead of having No Heart as "Data" perhaps it would be better to have bosses like No Heart/Armor of the Master, Anti-Riku/Anti-Saix, Vivi, the Organization Data battles, etc., to be categorized as "Simulations" instead, to differentiate them a bit better from other digital guys like Data-Riku and Sark?70.71.109.113 04:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
- Weren't we going to change it to "Other" or something?"We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 02:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
