Forum:Was the move a bad idea?: Difference between revisions
Chitalian8 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Wikia's editors are also very disorganized, look at their recent forums. Many of their edits are to the user talk space, and plus, [[User:UnknownChaser/UnversedBattle|our version]] of Battle Missions will be superior to theirs. {{User:Chitalian8/Sig}} 18:21, 6 May 2011 (EDT) | Wikia's editors are also very disorganized, look at their recent forums. Many of their edits are to the user talk space, and plus, [[User:UnknownChaser/UnversedBattle|our version]] of Battle Missions will be superior to theirs. {{User:Chitalian8/Sig}} 18:21, 6 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
I just need to say this; Hell no. {{User:Erry/Sig4}} 19:09, 6 May 2011 (EDT) |
Revision as of 23:09, 6 May 2011
|
Check Recent Changes. We've got more mainspace edits, which is really all that matters. --Ag (Silver) - 47 107.8682 amu ~Crono 16:27, 6 May 2011 (EDT)
We don't have to use Oasis anymore, and readers don't have to see Oasis when they read. Yeah, as Crono hinted on, we've got the harder workers at this wiki, while the rest stayed at wikia. We no longer have wikia staff breathing down our necks either, which is definitely a plus. I have no idea where you got "more cleaned up" from. Chitalian8 16:43, 6 May 2011 (EDT)
I meant some of our pages are kinda blank and they have more that are finished. My best example Is battle missions. P.S. If something I put down on the forum it's because I'm on my iPod instead of computer.
Wikia's editors are also very disorganized, look at their recent forums. Many of their edits are to the user talk space, and plus, our version of Battle Missions will be superior to theirs. Chitalian8 18:21, 6 May 2011 (EDT)
I just need to say this; Hell no. User:Erry/Sig4 19:09, 6 May 2011 (EDT)