6,759
edits
Forum:"Heartless Manufactory" - One-Time-Only Guests: Difference between revisions
Forum:"Heartless Manufactory" - One-Time-Only Guests (edit)
Revision as of 12:39, 18 April 2011
, 13 years agono edit summary
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::The question then is what to do if Oavatos and the IP come back and want to do their dockets. Should they work with each other, or should they do dockets with Roxas and Uxie?{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 02:20, 18 April 2011 (EDT) | ::The question then is what to do if Oavatos and the IP come back and want to do their dockets. Should they work with each other, or should they do dockets with Roxas and Uxie?{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 02:20, 18 April 2011 (EDT) | ||
{{Uxie|time= | {{Uxie|time=02:26, 18 April 2011 (EDT)|luna=Work with Roxas! Great idea, Kryten! I would be happy to do it, y'know. Gracias, amigo! Still, there is a chance this can happen again, but this idea is good.}} | ||
While it's not a bad idea right now, the problem is that we can't always wait for there to be two unpaired offenders, and mostly likely the offenders that care won't want to wait, especially since the longer a warning is left alone, the less likely people are to remember to handle it. | While it's not a bad idea right now, the problem is that we can't always wait for there to be two unpaired offenders, and mostly likely the offenders that care won't want to wait, especially since the longer a warning is left alone, the less likely people are to remember to handle it. | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:Obviously, having the two offenders work together is by far preferable. In the absence of consent from both parties, it seems that we should allow single-party dockets. | :Obviously, having the two offenders work together is by far preferable. In the absence of consent from both parties, it seems that we should allow single-party dockets. | ||
:But again, what of the missing offender? If he comes back, do we have him do a single ticket? Wouldn't that allow people to just work on their own, instead of getting the lesson? Do we want to inflict a harsher punishment for deciding not to work with your assigned partner?{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 04:20, 18 April 2011 (EDT) | :But again, what of the missing offender? If he comes back, do we have him do a single ticket? Wouldn't that allow people to just work on their own, instead of getting the lesson? Do we want to inflict a harsher punishment for deciding not to work with your assigned partner?{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 04:20, 18 April 2011 (EDT) | ||
{{Uxie|time=08:39, 18 April 2011 (EDT)|zoe=Just a few words that might be helpful: | |||
:Two people fight, and both get a warning. One agrees to sign up for the HP, but the other refuses. An admin should explain why they must work at the HP, so that the other person will have no choice to avoid harsher punishment. Should he/she still refuse to do the work, they should be put on a "Black List", which is a list of users (or regular IPs) who refuses to take part with the HP or does minor vandalisom. | |||
:Black List Users must be watched at all times, in case they do more bad things. There will be ways to get off the black list, such as doing helpful stuff around the wiki and have a whole week without a problem. Their names should be in color, depending on their seriousness: Yellow for one strike, Orange for two strikes, Red for three, Brown for four, and will be blocked if it reaches five. They can be demoted in color (eg: from Orange to Yellow) after doing the positive things. However, if a major fight or vandal hits the wiki, the person is automatically under the "Brown" status. | |||
Do you think this is a good idea? We have a simiar list in the Spyro Wiki, but this is kinder than the other one (I gave a Five-Strke List; we have a Three-Strike List).}} | |||