Forum:Suggestions for improving IRC bot: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
I've already implemented the curse word logging. I'll also not remove the !google feature, it's simply an extension of the user directly copy/pasting links from google him/her self. Besides, it works by the "i'm feeling lucky" feature of google searches. Therefore, googling something is oft rare to display adult results. If there is anything else to discuss, please email me. I may come back here, but I probably won't, I hate wiki editing. | ''I've already implemented the curse word logging. I'll also not remove the !google feature, it's simply an extension of the user directly copy/pasting links from google him/her self. Besides, it works by the "i'm feeling lucky" feature of google searches. Therefore, googling something is oft rare to display adult results. If there is anything else to discuss, please email me. I may come back here, but I probably won't, I hate wiki editing. | ||
-xAdolax@gmail.com | -xAdolax@gmail.com | ||
'' | |||
Revision as of 01:37, 26 June 2010
Based on a discussion with Adola, I have a few requests for changing the bot, and others might have more, or might have reasons why my requests should not come to pass:
- Disable the !ed function
- Disable the !joke sub-functions: dirty, ethnic, religion, politics, blonde
- Disable the !hugs function
All of these produce overwhelmingly inappropriate content.
Adola was also talking about (I don't know whether it was a suggestion or hyperbole) a function that would have the bot record every use of a swearword, and report it to the ops, so that an abusive chatter could be disciplined.Glorious CHAOS! 00:15, June 26, 2010 (UTC)
I like that Idea. —DemonicKunai 00:16, June 26, 2010 (UTC)
Sounds like a plan. Might as well remove those commands before the IRC gets a little bit over-rated with innapropriate jokes. --
史克威尔罗克斯
00:18, June 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Not only that, but there are other inappropriate bugs with the bot. the !google function went directly to a pornsite one time (well, that was because a user directly used !google porn >.>). Nevertheless, something like that should never be stumbledupon, especially on a channel that promotes a PG rating. If there's a way to screen that, or if we should just chuck the whole !google thing, it should be addressed immediately. --
LegoAlchemist 00:40, June 26, 2010 (UTC)
If the result of the pornsite or any other innapropriate results continues to happen with the !google action, just get rid of it for sure then. --史克威尔罗克斯 00:49, June 26, 2010 (UTC)
I've already implemented the curse word logging. I'll also not remove the !google feature, it's simply an extension of the user directly copy/pasting links from google him/her self. Besides, it works by the "i'm feeling lucky" feature of google searches. Therefore, googling something is oft rare to display adult results. If there is anything else to discuss, please email me. I may come back here, but I probably won't, I hate wiki editing.
-xAdolax@gmail.com
