53,710
edits
Talk:Dive to the Heart: Difference between revisions
→um, the bit about mickey...
LapisScarab (talk | contribs) |
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 322: | Line 322: | ||
{{LyingMemories|time=[[User:Lying Memories|Lying Memories]] 06:46, July 21, 2010 (UTC)|text= the bit that says mickey could be the voice of dive to the heart's stations, well, despite that making sense, isn't that STILL speculation? No matter how much something makes sense, if it's speculation, it should have no place on the article. That's my thought anyway. Besides, how do we know it isn't that Keyblade Master of Legend? The one talked about from the Master Xehanort reports? Wasn't he the very first keyblade master? Basically, I think it's speculative and if I don't receive any objections in the next few days, I'm gonna take it as a sign that it can go bye bye.}} | {{LyingMemories|time=[[User:Lying Memories|Lying Memories]] 06:46, July 21, 2010 (UTC)|text= the bit that says mickey could be the voice of dive to the heart's stations, well, despite that making sense, isn't that STILL speculation? No matter how much something makes sense, if it's speculation, it should have no place on the article. That's my thought anyway. Besides, how do we know it isn't that Keyblade Master of Legend? The one talked about from the Master Xehanort reports? Wasn't he the very first keyblade master? Basically, I think it's speculative and if I don't receive any objections in the next few days, I'm gonna take it as a sign that it can go bye bye.}} | ||
{{KrytenKoro|It's right there on the edge, but those characters have been demonstrated to do narration like that, so I think it's just within the necessary bounds. However, we don't know anything about the Keyblade Master of Legend, so ''that'' would be absolute speculation.}} | |||
{{LapisScarab|time=07:00, July 21, 2010 (UTC)|text=It should most definitely be removed, it's blatant speculation. If it's not, it needs to be sourced and reworded.}} | {{LapisScarab|time=07:00, July 21, 2010 (UTC)|text=It should most definitely be removed, it's blatant speculation. If it's not, it needs to be sourced and reworded.}} | ||