Template talk:Fix: Difference between revisions
From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: That type of template refers to an article or section, but there are some articles that are mostly clean. It’s useful to point out exactly which line requires a source, verification, clarification, etc. —[[User:Shidou|Shidou]] 02:41, 17 January 2008 (UTC) | : That type of template refers to an article or section, but there are some articles that are mostly clean. It’s useful to point out exactly which line requires a source, verification, clarification, etc. —[[User:Shidou|Shidou]] 02:41, 17 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
::Aha, I see... however, we tend to use the talk pages for those kind of things. It also reduces the risk of edit wars, given that editors have enough brainpower to read the talk pages (may sound simple, but so many neglegt it). But if you think you can make this work, sure, I'll give you one weeks worth of trial-running, just to see how much this puppy is worth. I should however warn you, that we don't follow the strict procedures of the Wikipedia. --[[User:Hecko X|Hecko X]] 03:03, 17 January 2008 (UTC) | ::Aha, I see... however, we tend to use the talk pages for those kind of things. It also reduces the risk of edit wars, given that editors have enough brainpower to read the talk pages (may sound simple, but so many neglegt it). But if you think you can make this work, sure, I'll give you one weeks worth of trial-running, just to see how much this puppy is worth. I should however warn you, that we don't follow the strict procedures of the Wikipedia. --[[User:Hecko X|Hecko X]] 03:03, 17 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::I actually think this is a good idea. References, something we would need. [[User:Bluerfn|Blue。]] 03:21, 17 January 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:21, 17 January 2008
Are you trying to make templates like {{Images}}, {{Cleanup}}, {{Dewikify}}, {{Expand}}, etc., obsolete or what? I ask because it seems to me, that the reasons behind creating this template is already being fulfilled by those templates. --Hecko X 02:24, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- That type of template refers to an article or section, but there are some articles that are mostly clean. It’s useful to point out exactly which line requires a source, verification, clarification, etc. —Shidou 02:41, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Aha, I see... however, we tend to use the talk pages for those kind of things. It also reduces the risk of edit wars, given that editors have enough brainpower to read the talk pages (may sound simple, but so many neglegt it). But if you think you can make this work, sure, I'll give you one weeks worth of trial-running, just to see how much this puppy is worth. I should however warn you, that we don't follow the strict procedures of the Wikipedia. --Hecko X 03:03, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- I actually think this is a good idea. References, something we would need. Blue。 03:21, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Aha, I see... however, we tend to use the talk pages for those kind of things. It also reduces the risk of edit wars, given that editors have enough brainpower to read the talk pages (may sound simple, but so many neglegt it). But if you think you can make this work, sure, I'll give you one weeks worth of trial-running, just to see how much this puppy is worth. I should however warn you, that we don't follow the strict procedures of the Wikipedia. --Hecko X 03:03, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
