Talk:Jasmine: Difference between revisions
(moved back) |
KrytenKoro (talk | contribs) (→Jasmine: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Honorifics are usually avoided here unless they are known by that name or it is needed to designate which one - if linking is the problem, a redirect can be created. Perhaps this should be moved back to just "Jasmine"? '''''[[User:Scottch|<span style="color:#00cccc">Scott</span>]][[User talk:Scottch|<span style="color:#ff9900">ch</span>]]''''' 00:13, 15 May 2007 (UTC) | Honorifics are usually avoided here unless they are known by that name or it is needed to designate which one - if linking is the problem, a redirect can be created. Perhaps this should be moved back to just "Jasmine"? '''''[[User:Scottch|<span style="color:#00cccc">Scott</span>]][[User talk:Scottch|<span style="color:#ff9900">ch</span>]]''''' 00:13, 15 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
:It's been moved back, so disregard :-P '''''[[User:Scottch|<span style="color:#00cccc">Scott</span>]][[User talk:Scottch|<span style="color:#ff9900">ch</span>]]''''' 00:15, 15 May 2007 (UTC) | :It's been moved back, so disregard :-P '''''[[User:Scottch|<span style="color:#00cccc">Scott</span>]][[User talk:Scottch|<span style="color:#ff9900">ch</span>]]''''' 00:15, 15 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
== Jasmine == | |||
"Jasmine first appears in ''Aladdin'' as the wealthy and strong-willed princess of Agrabah who is loved by everyone in her kingdom." | |||
Her being strong-willed has nothing to do with why she's loved by everyone in the kingdom. Putting strong-willed there makes no sense for the flow of the sentence. | |||
As far as her beauty, (1) it's not equivalent to sex, (2) calling minors beautiful is deeply engrained in every culture, and (3) even if it ''was'' equivalent to sex, age of consent is hardly universally above 16, and (4) it ''definitely'' wasn't back then. | |||
Finally, consensus is a thing that exists. The story doesn't need an omnipotent God to come down to describe a character for it to be valid. It's a major plot point to Jasmine's character that she's widely regarded as beautiful, and that detail ''is part of the KH series' plot''.{{User:KrytenKoro/Sig}} 18:51, 19 April 2019 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:51, 19 April 2019
Honorifics are usually avoided here unless they are known by that name or it is needed to designate which one - if linking is the problem, a redirect can be created. Perhaps this should be moved back to just "Jasmine"? Scottch 00:13, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Jasmine
"Jasmine first appears in Aladdin as the wealthy and strong-willed princess of Agrabah who is loved by everyone in her kingdom."
Her being strong-willed has nothing to do with why she's loved by everyone in the kingdom. Putting strong-willed there makes no sense for the flow of the sentence.
As far as her beauty, (1) it's not equivalent to sex, (2) calling minors beautiful is deeply engrained in every culture, and (3) even if it was equivalent to sex, age of consent is hardly universally above 16, and (4) it definitely wasn't back then.
Finally, consensus is a thing that exists. The story doesn't need an omnipotent God to come down to describe a character for it to be valid. It's a major plot point to Jasmine's character that she's widely regarded as beautiful, and that detail is part of the KH series' plot."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 18:51, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
