Talk:Attractions

Seriously Byz, don't. This will need its own page in due course, and there's no point making a redirect for it now. TRSNX 15:03, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

A redirect is fine for now and besides someone else has made a redirect for Rapunzel so i don't see how this is any different. Byzantinefire - There are no strings on me (talk) 15:11, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

I don't know why this had to be done in the first place for Rapunzel; we never did this for when Jaq was announced for Birth by Sleep. The page was erased immediately. TRSNX 15:58, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Rapunzel was probably made into a redirect (temporarily) because we have no information about her involvement in Kingdom Hearts. Attraction Flow is something we actually could make an article out of at the present time. - Eternal Nothingness XIII 17:30, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

I have to disagree. We know too little about Attraction Flow at this moment to make it into an article. I think we should delete this redirect, and Rapunzel as well, for now. TheSilentHero 17:33, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

I wouldn't be against making some sort of preliminary article for Attraction Flow. We've already seen at least 3 or 4 different uses of the technique, and we know what it is at a basic level. If not an actual article, at least some sort of preliminary design should be whipped up. Chitalian8 17:37, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

If we have enough to cobble together an article, then let's go for it. I think we do anyway, not sure about what the rest think. Otherwise, delete altogether. TRSNX 20:07, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

We certainly have more about Attraction Flow to make a rough article than we do the so-called "Kingdom of Corona." - Eternal Nothingness XIII 21:00, 18 August 2015 (UTC)