Forum:Archiving policy: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{Forumheader|The World that Never was}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with either your talk page template or four tildes ~~~~ -->...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
{{Sove|time=19:31, 31 July 2012 (UTC)|saixtalk=[[User talk:Soraxroxas]] | {{Sove|time=19:31, 31 July 2012 (UTC)|saixtalk=[[User talk:Soraxroxas]] | ||
This is getting ridiculous. He is now going to archive messages the second he reads them and we don't have any rule against doing that. I propose that only messages older than x amount of time may be | This is getting ridiculous. He is now going to archive messages the second he reads them and we don't have any rule against doing that. I propose that only messages older than x amount of time may be archived. Archives already make it harder when you want to search something from someone's talk page, so archiving should have limits. | ||
I also propose that warnings may only be archived after one year has passed since the '''most recent''' warning, after which they can be archived and considered expired. Not only this allows a user who rarely gets warnings to have the warnings eventually expired, it also makes tracking warnings much less bothersome, when we don't need to check the user's archives for any previous warnings. | I also propose that warnings may only be archived after one year has passed since the '''most recent''' warning, after which they can be archived and considered expired. Not only this allows a user who rarely gets warnings to have the warnings eventually expired, it also makes tracking warnings much less bothersome, when we don't need to check the user's archives for any previous warnings. | ||
And let the discussion begin!}} | And let the discussion begin!}} |
Revision as of 19:43, 31 July 2012
|