Template talk:Suite: Difference between revisions
From the Kingdom Hearts Wiki, the Kingdom Hearts encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
—{{User:Soxra/Sig|t=}} 01:14, 11 January 2012 (UTC) | —{{User:Soxra/Sig|t=}} 01:14, 11 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
::Looks fantastic--{{User:Dark-EnigmaXIII/Sig}} 19:47, 11 January 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:47, 11 January 2012
Visibility
If I may, should this not be formatted in such a way that would draw the reader's attention, more or less scream, "There's more content"? The little grey box is a bit hard to find, especially for a casual user. Soxxeh 7:31am, December 24, 2011 (UTC)
- If you want to run some tests on your personal css, you're more than welcome. On the other hand, this is the basic format that's been used on the Transformers wiki for basically forever, and they've had no troubles with it. Basically, if you want to jazz it up some go ahead, but my main concern is that the actual lead of the article should still be visible when you open the article."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 04:33, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- What about something like this, as seen [[here? --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 18:15, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- That solves the concern of keeping the lead visible, but...dude, that thing is aggressively painful to the eyes. Seriously though, just test things out in the css, take a screenshot."We're werewolves, not swearwolves." (KrytenKoro) 20:19, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
- What about something like this, as seen [[here? --Neumannz, The Dark Falcon 18:15, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
What I cooked up: (Keep in mind that it only shows the "Suite" tab. If there was Game:Suite, or Quotes:Suite, or Card:Suite, those would show also.)
Suite |
Another example:
Additionally, if we had a Suite/Suite page, it would exclude anything else and read only data from there (in the form Label1/Link1/Label2/Link2/.../Label9/Link9). Thoughts?