Forum:"Heartless Manufactory" - One-Time-Only Guests: Difference between revisions

Forum:"Heartless Manufactory" - One-Time-Only Guests (edit)

Revision as of 20:27, 18 April 2011

1,367 bytes added , 13 years ago

no edit summary

As if!

2,791

edits

@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 {{AlVan|time16:19, 18 April 2011 (EDT)|text=We've only had one case so far. If your talking about me I can't stay on the wiki all night long and I have to go to school. I also don't know anything about re:coded. I finished that game by guessing. I don't even own 358/2 days but plan on buying it soon.}}
+{{Asif|sho=EDIT CONFLICT:Hmm...
+I've put some thought into it, and here's my idea: how about making a docket for people who are alone, where they get a task and must perform it on their own.  This could be used if someone insults another person and the other one doesn't retaliate, meaning only one person gets a warning.  They would have to sign up and perform a task alone that would be challenging to do alone, which would teach them about working together by showing what happens when people ''don't'' work together.
+If there's a situation where two people get warnings but only one wants to participate, the one who doesn't want to partake in the Heartless Manufactory round should be temporarily removed of an important privelage: the ability to post in the Twilight Town Library, usage of the IRC channel, or some punishment that fits the crime.  The other person should be allowed to start a project alone, but only has to do half the work.  That way if the other person decides to come back, s/he still has work to do.  Also, if they still don't participate after that, you can block him/her temporarily or keep removing privelages until s/he decides to help, after which the warning will be removed and all privelages will be restored.
+If they ''never'' decide to participate... I would let admins decide that.
+What do you think?  Is it unreasonable?}}