33,308
edits
Forum:Reached my breaking point: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
ShardofTruth (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
@Crono- actually, it reinforces my point. If a user is going to us an image a hundred times over, especially one that amounts to only a few hundred bytes, there is no reason why it should be forced to be be hosted somewhere where size manipulation in bytes and link giving, or just general viewing are handicapped. Also, maybe I have a different definition of "wiki purpose", but VSymbol links to no mainspace or article use template pages. {{The Inexistentsig}} 13:44, 20 February 2011 (EST) | @Crono- actually, it reinforces my point. If a user is going to us an image a hundred times over, especially one that amounts to only a few hundred bytes, there is no reason why it should be forced to be be hosted somewhere where size manipulation in bytes and link giving, or just general viewing are handicapped. Also, maybe I have a different definition of "wiki purpose", but VSymbol links to no mainspace or article use template pages. {{The Inexistentsig}} 13:44, 20 February 2011 (EST) | ||
{{ShardofTruth|time=19:54, 6 March 2011 (EST)|talk=Since the decision is final now I have three concerns: | |||
*I, and most likely 90% of the users use Xiggies Talk Template as the basis for our own template. It's currently impossible to change the image adress that easily, because it's heavily coded in wiki style. Can someone with template super skills make a version, where linking an image from an external source is easy? | |||
*If only one template is allowed now, what about the mutiple templates that were used in the past? It would be an huge amount of work to replace every coding on every page, someone has ever written on. | |||
*Is it really necessary to delete all CoM and 358/2 Days talk sprites? I think most of them are official material, so why shouldn't they be hosted here? }} | |||