21,449
edits
User talk:LegoAlchemist: Difference between revisions
→Okay, you're going to hate me, but
| Line 236: | Line 236: | ||
:::The way I see it, we could have the specific commands (such as Attack commands) under both re:coded and BBS articles, but also categorize them under game specific categories. For example, a re:coded attack command would be categorized under "Kingdom Hearts re:coded commands" and "Attack commands". Likewise a BBS attack command would be "Kingdom Hearts Birth by Sleep commands" and "Attack commands". I really don't see the point of going so far as to ''merging'' the categories. And I'm not really hyped about re-doing all of that categorization. | :::The way I see it, we could have the specific commands (such as Attack commands) under both re:coded and BBS articles, but also categorize them under game specific categories. For example, a re:coded attack command would be categorized under "Kingdom Hearts re:coded commands" and "Attack commands". Likewise a BBS attack command would be "Kingdom Hearts Birth by Sleep commands" and "Attack commands". I really don't see the point of going so far as to ''merging'' the categories. And I'm not really hyped about re-doing all of that categorization. | ||
:::Also, it would've been better to tell me this ''before'' I added categories to over two-hundred articles. --{{User:LegoAlchemist/Sig}} 06:32, February 4, 2011 (UTC) | :::Also, it would've been better to tell me this ''before'' I added categories to over two-hundred articles. --{{User:LegoAlchemist/Sig}} 06:32, February 4, 2011 (UTC) | ||
:i WAS THINKING ABOUT THE SAME, BUT i GOT STUMPED ON WHAT THE COMMAND TYPE CATEGORIES themselves WOULD BE CATEGORIZED AS. (DID THAT MAKE SENSE?) --{{User:Neumannz/SigTemplate}} 06:39, February 4, 2011 (UTC) | |||